Especially WUMs who aren't even arsenal fans.Originally Posted by Charlie the Gooner
Not naming names tho...
Especially WUMs who aren't even arsenal fans.
Not naming names tho...
Oh well, thats why i won't be posting alot like last time need to keep my sanity lol.
can we jsut clear this up, we are not selling song as said on the other page to balance the books, we are selling him because he has had a piss poor attiude this summer and has told the club he should be elsewhere so wenger has told him to fuck off
Once again Ollie is the sane voice of reason.
I've already warned LDG about coming on here and throwing facts around.
Tut tut.
Yeah, people aren't interested in facts really, nonsensical rants are much better.
so it's purely coincidence that with the sale of song we will have received in transfer fees exactly what we spent. With the sale of Vela and others probably more....Song's attitude is irrelevant he would have been sold irregardless, just it so happens he has decided to be a big head which creates a misleading perception of Wenger having big cahones.
There's no point, there's a clique of Kroenke apologists here who'll defend every single decision the board makes, no matter how detrimental it is to the long term welfare of the club. If you try to point that out, you'll be accused of being a City fan, because these people don't seem to understand the difference between criticising the "board" and criticising the club. Try to have a different opinion and they will smother you with sarcastic digs, or misrepresent your opinion to make you sound unreasonable.
Joker, firstly, you're wrong and secondly I don't think that is what this thread was about.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote