User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 45

Thread: Financial fair play my arse.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member AKBapologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,220
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Would rather billionaires payed for success than fans paying for... Not an awful lot really. Just saying.

  2. #2
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69,086
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AKBapologist View Post
    Would rather billionaires payed for success than fans paying for... Not an awful lot really. Just saying.
    Exactly right. Otherwise why are they involved in the game at all? Just to make a profit? In which case, how can their presence be good for the club? In football terms? Also there are many degrees between buying success and what we currently do, avoid investment in the playing side at all costs. Some people are asking for the rich guy to dig in his pocket and make a few key signings that will fill the gaping holes in the team. For example, it's high time we had a defence, every other team has one and I don't think it's unreasonable for the fans of Arsenal to want one too. But when it's suggested we match our spending to our ambitions, run a smart transfer policy, play to the realities of the league we are in rather than wander off on some idealistic Spanish fantasy, the rehearsed response from the ostriches is to roll out Abramovich and proclaim we don't want his sort here.
    Für eure Sicherheit

  3. #3
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    41,188
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn View Post
    Exactly right. Otherwise why are they involved in the game at all? Just to make a profit? In which case, how can their presence be good for the club? In football terms? Also there are many degrees between buying success and what we currently do, avoid investment in the playing side at all costs. Some people are asking for the rich guy to dig in his pocket and make a few key signings that will fill the gaping holes in the team. For example, it's high time we had a defence, every other team has one and I don't think it's unreasonable for the fans of Arsenal to want one too. But when it's suggested we match our spending to our ambitions, run a smart transfer policy, play to the realities of the league we are in rather than wander off on some idealistic Spanish fantasy, the rehearsed response from the ostriches is to roll out Abramovich and proclaim we don't want his sort here.
    You were doing well till the last bit which is rubbish.
    EVERYONE on here thinks Wenger could and should have spent more. I've not seen a single person argue differently.
    As for the defence, IMO the problem there is coaching, not the players. The way we concede goals (long straight balls, set pieces) shows poor defensive organisation, I don't think signing big would improve that.
    And the assertion that we "avoid investment in the playing side at all costs", don't we have one of the highest wage bills in the country? Isn't that investing in the playing side? But as I said, pretty much everyone thinks we should have spent more in the transfer market too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •