If he rejected City and the AGM said we sold for 'footballing reasons' then there could be some truth in this. Plus RVP said there was no talk of money in the meeting in his open letter. Add all this together, especially with Wenger saying RVP rejected City, you know for sure that PHW was out of line and stirring up shit when he tried to accuse RVP of being lured away by City's big wages.
The article sounds about right
Goes in with RVCs statement and what we all know about Wenger and Gazidis
None of them have come out of this looking good.
I just don't care anymore anyway. Means very little to me now.
He was an Arsenal player....but not in the Bergkamp sense of the word.
I just don't care.
More worrying, as you say, is the way the board and manager come out of this.
It's better to burn out, than to fade away.
Wenget wearing an eye patch. That's all I took from that.
Indeed. It's hard to stop caring though when the **** is banging them in every other week. We just need to get tomorrow out the way and move on.Originally Posted by LDG
Not surprised by the Board and Wenger. We've always known Wenger won't be dictated to.
Not surprised, I'd say most if not all of the players who recently left has have done so not because of financial incentives but because they didn't think we were ambitious enough.
To be honest though, if you're a manager and one of your players tells you what to do, that's bound to rub you up the wrong way. RVC is a billy big bollocks and I don't think Wenget can deal with those type of players.
All the more reason why we'll continue to hit the glass ceiling while he's in charge and why he prefers this sort of policy. Stubborn as a mule.
There isn't a manager in the world who'll sign players and staff just because some player tells them to.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote