Wenger Slaughterhouse

[GP]

Fast Food

Burger King

IHOP

in'n'out

Taco Bell

Diabetes

[She Wore A Yellow Ribbon]

mrs letters

putting up with in'n'out since last sunday

[Marc Overmars]

All things American are awesome.

Never heard anyone who knows a thing about countries say a bad word about them.

[GP]

mrs letters

putting up with in'n'out since last sunday

Yeah but only one of each I would imagine.

[Olivier's xmas twist]

All things American are awesome.

Kim Kardashian

[She Wore A Yellow Ribbon]

Yeah but only one of each I would imagine.

i think its more a case of in'n'straightout

[Marc Overmars]

Kim Kardashian

Splaff.

[Özil's Panoramic View]

British dentistry

No koolaide required

[Olivier's xmas twist]

British dentistry

No koolaide required

Pretty much. They fuck up your teeth so you have to go back and pay more.

[jelgoon]

Hes not confused - neither am I. I wasnt saying that clubs will literally be restrained from transfer dealing but obviously if they are faced with a European ban they are not going to breach the rules, so its the same thing in practice. Already UEFA have backed down on certain sanctions after taking leagal advice; for example, proposals to impose player transfer embargos on clubs failing to meet the FFP rules have been dropped

I think your barrister friend is getting a little bit confused - it doesn't restrict how much clubs can spend on transfers (especially if their income is already significant). They can spend as much as they want, like now, it's just that doing so within the coming years could result in bans or sanctions on UEFA's competitions; it's not going to stop them from competing however they want so far as the Premier League goes.

In any case, most clubs are agreeing to it (now that could be because they know it won't mean anything) but it's not going to be the case that it's never implemented.