I'd say I'd rather be entertained and not win than not being entertained not win and be patronise....yes.Originally Posted by McNamara That Ghost...
Holloway is relatively untested wouldn't know what we got from him.
Wenger isn't good for the club that's what I know, with that in mind bringing in someone different to have a go at turning things around is no bad thing.
You're missing the point. Who said it was okay to lose 5-1? We all know what's going on at Arsenal. Reality is we can do fuck all about it if we want to keep supporting the team. However bad it gets though, bullshit like hoping we get beaten or wanting to see tossers like Redknapp at the club is taking disappointment too far. I used to have this DVD player that skipped from time to time and really pissed me off. Eventually every skip used to reduce me to a rage so I grabbed the fucking thing and smashed it to bits. After that I couldn't watch any DVDs at all. I wanted the fucking thing to be perfect, that was the promise of DVD. My point is, Harry Redknapp is a ****.
Für eure Sicherheit
Wenger was lucky to be at Arsenal as well, he was a nobody. What about the argument about entertainments....Wenger isn't entertaining in any way.
he signed saha and nelson in january last year. where are they now? taht was a waste of time, and hardly transfers to light the owrld up. who else has he signed? adebayor on loan? hardly a proven player, just a ****. those signings were not ones made by someone trying to improve the club.
aslo outside influences were of his own making, his tax dealings shouldnt have been dodgy in the first place, or dodgy enough for them to be looked at. his fault. no one else's
Have a go is pretty much 'Arry's calling card.
I seriously doubt you'd be happy with us slumming it in midtable (or worse) with a crum of comfort being you might enjoy watching us when you talk about jealousy of other clubs and the level you think we should be at. If Wenger is to be replaced by someone, someone not untested then it has to be someone that has proven himself to be better than Wenger, not just anyone that might ask his side to break quickly.
Other way around really. We're amazingly lucky to have had Wenger come here. Maybe things are so great now but without Wenger think of what we would have missed out on. The irony is it's that magnificence hanging him out to dry now. He set the standards so high he can't get close to them. Nobody can by the way, not even the modern day Barcelona. If we'd have had a Redknapp in instead we'd all be sitting here creaming it about how great it was to be 4th.
Für eure Sicherheit
No its not, But its a cup none od the teams give a shit about and if had the choice not to take part none would. Of course if you get in a final you want to win it. However the top club heck even the readings don't care for it much. Hence why they never play strong teams.
I walk a lonely road, the only one that I have ever known, don't know where it goes but it's home to me and I walk alone.
Best thing you posted in this Thread.
Wenger might no be good don't mean we have to replace him with someone worse.
Lots of people. Wenger isn't the team, he's a guy paid handsomely to deliver profits and he does it very well....what he doesn't do is care about the fans or what happens on the pitch.
I think from a fans point of view there is no argument for anyone employing Wenger, he's shown he's failed, his teams no longer play good football and all his priority is finances over football.
Redknapp is neither here nor there, Wenger offers no advantage over him IMO.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote