We need to keep him because we won't be signing anyone better that's for sure.
Money
Position
Little bit both
Other (pls specify)
We need to keep him because we won't be signing anyone better that's for sure.
the thing with walcott is i now expect him to create something out of nothing. ive never had that feeling before.
it feels good.
Like autoerotic asphyxiationOriginally Posted by Wiltord's Winner
ive felt that for a long time dont worry
Would have much appreciated if Wenger could have kept his mouth shut and afforded us a few more weeks of hopes of him signing di ting.
His interview on MOTD didn't sound too promising at all, it smelt exactly like the RVC interview last season, ironically, after the spuds game.
Last edited by KSE Comedy Club; 19-11-2012 at 01:05 AM.
IF he leaves, then he's a twat who should be more loyal.
However, football-y, not too bothered. He's not as good as his stats suggest and most other players in the team are more competent players. He's not good enough to keep if he doesn't want to be here.
"Despair is a narcotic. It lulls the mind into indifference."
I get the feeling he does want to be here though. If he wanted to leave he would have gone in the summer, the club wouldn't have kept a player in their final year if they didn't think he would renew.
Wenget doesn't rate him. If Gervinho wasn't crocked Theo would still be on the bench.
If he leaves we're most likely not going to replace him with a well established, top class winger. In his position he's the best we've got. Gervinho is not as efficient as him either in terms of creating chances or scoring, while AOC's reputation doesn't really match his contributions for us (although I do rate him). Podolski still doesn't look comfortable as a winger and is more likely to drift inside, so I'd be worried if Theo did leave.
And loyalty's a two way street, if the club's been fobbing him off with the new contract then I can understand his frustration.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Cheer up. Join the 