Originally Posted by Injury Time
:goodpost:
do to make the club stay competitive if you do not have worry about share value?
as opposed to booing the manager without whom afc wouldn't be where it is now?
slippery slope
you mean we are being robbed but in different way than abrmovich allegedly gained his wealth?
remove wenger and get in a manger that can affect what is happening on the pitch.
yes because sufficient time has been allowed and paying punters should feel the right to boo after numerous performances like that. slippery slope only when you are locked into an ownership problem such as ours but there is also a line where concern for today is of more concern than tomorrow.
so with all that ridiculous wealth you wouldn't be tempted to splash any of it on the team when there is nothing preventing you from doing so?
despite abramovich's money, I am sure chelsea fans still pay handsomely to watch their team --- they are therefore allowed to boo a manager that is falling short of an extremely high standard.
and i suppose while 7 yrs is enough for some, one game suffices for others
as we weren't selling off our best players for the balance sheet, then we wouldn't need to go barmy, no.
he didn't get the chance to fall short did he? it seemed to me the crowd set the tone for that game and the teams performance matched it. i'm not sure there's much too much positive thinking happening amongst chelsea fans - certainly not from what i've seen and rightly so.despite abramovich's money, I am sure chelsea fans still pay handsomely to watch their team --- they are therefore allowed to boo a manager that is falling short of an extremely high standard.
and i suppose while 7 yrs is enough for some, one game suffices for others
anyway, i don't want to go on forever on a huge tangent about chelsea after my posts in the last page. i think we get each others stance on this so i'll leave this one here.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote