User Tag List

View Poll Results: Which centerback would be the best option for AFC?

Voters
29. You may not vote on this poll
  • Scott Dann

    2 6.90%
  • Per Mertersacker

    2 6.90%
  • Phill Jagielka

    3 10.34%
  • Gary Cahill

    13 44.83%
  • Chris Samba

    9 31.03%
  • Other

    0 0%
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 73

Thread: Center Back

  1. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    740
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    how tall are cahill and jagielka?
    i remember AW commenting on lack of height in our defense...

  2. #32
    Member AKBapologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,220
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Dann, Cahill are 6ft 2, Jag, 5ft 11 I think.


    Also:
    Goal reporting #Arsenal have verbal agreement to sign Scott Dann for £6m.

  3. #33
    Member Fats's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Milton Keynes
    Posts
    498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Punchinello Beezo View Post
    Besides it dosnt matter who we buy, they will look shit. Said it before and will say it again, we could have the best back 4 in the world and would still look casual, uniterested, bambi-like and still concede stupid goals.

    You know why? We have no organisation, no team defence, no help from the midfield, a huge gulf between the defence and midfield, we play too high a line, are physically weak, are different nationalities and have no concept of what "winning" a duel is.

    IMO we have one actual defender in the whole squad and thats Sagna, he is so much better than the rest its almost embarassing for him at times. (I( cant judge vermaelen as i cant even remember what he looks like) Our team will continue to concede goals while we are coached and set up this way.

    Also the DM's we have with are a bit shit which doesnt help either.
    Agree with most of that. Team is set up for no holds barred football of which defending is a filthy word so as said makes no difference who is in the back 4. We have fundamental issues there with Arsene.

    Cahill's distribution is very very poor, so will go for Jags.

  4. #34
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69,033
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wenger will go for the cheapest option. The absolute bare minimum.
    Für eure Sicherheit

  5. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    740
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    "...Dann, who has regained fitness after missing the second half of last season through injury but was an unused substitute in the club’s Championship opener against Derby County last weekend."
    http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896/...ann-as-arsene?

    yay.

  6. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lambeth, London
    Posts
    5,890
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn View Post
    Wenger will go for the cheapest option. The absolute bare minimum.
    Yup, sad but true. I don't even think we'll buy from PL/England, I think Wenger has been working on the Jagielka & Cahill deals but because the selling clubs won't sell on the cheap Wenger will move for someone else.

    I wouldn't put it past him to buy cheap from Ligue One on deadline day.

  7. #37
    Member AKBapologist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,220
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    On a positive note, given birmingham collapsed and got relegated, maybe Dann was kinda important?

    Danns distribution is also much better than Cahills.

  8. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lambeth, London
    Posts
    5,890
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Out of the list Cahill would be my first choice, strong, very good in the air, mobile and not a bad passer. He has high potential too...I think he definitely has more in his locker to improve, not sure we're the right club for his development though. He's an upgrade on all our defenders bar Tommy V and has the potential to be our best defender IMHO.

    Jags would be a close 2nd, good all rounder, good organiser, not too sure about his aerial abilities. At present Jags IMHO is better than all of our Defenders including Tommy V, he's getting on a bit though so I'm not sure how much use he would be long term.

    Samba for me is a no, he's big but is slow...don't want him, he'd get found out in CL.

    Dann...don't rate him...a club like Stoke is his level IMHO.

    Mertesacker...as slow as a slug, don't want him.

  9. #39
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lambeth, London
    Posts
    5,890
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by AKBapologist View Post
    On a positive note, given birmingham collapsed and got relegated, maybe Dann was kinda important?

    Danns distribution is also much better than Cahills.
    I can't comment on Dann's distribution but from what I've seen of Cahill his distribution is actually not that bad. Admittedly I've only seen him on Sky and a few You Tube clips but his distribution seems pretty good to me.

  10. #40
    Member Fats's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Milton Keynes
    Posts
    498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why are so many people worried about how fast a defender is, especially at CB.

    Two names for you Adams, Bould!!!!.

    Bould couldnt catch a bloody cold let alone Joey Deacon so I am not so sure as a CB speed is a major factor.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •