User Tag List

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 63

Thread: Is it perspective or do we screw up more than others transfer wise?

  1. #11
    Administrator McNamara That Ghost...'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Colne, Lancashire.
    Posts
    169,607
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As well as Swansea have done, ultimately, they're midtable (not a criticism). And Newcastle are much further down than that.

  2. #12
    Member IBK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Highgate, London
    Posts
    4,011
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by McNamara That Ghost... View Post
    As well as Swansea have done, ultimately, they're midtable (not a criticism). And Newcastle are much further down than that.
    Agreed - but given that AW is obsessed with value for money, are we getting it?
    Putting the laughter back into manslaughter

  3. #13
    bye Xhaka Can’t's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    15,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by IBK View Post
    Agreed - but given that AW is obsessed with value for money, are we getting it?
    Not when you factor in wages.

  4. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,984
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    We just might be ahead of the pack, especially when we narrow it down to our stature, where we're said to one of the supposed 'big' clubs.

    Not sure any other 'big' club has so many of its players out on loan simply because they turned out to be massive slags who the club can never sell for one reason or the other.

    We have a player named Park whom, personally, I can't recall ever seeing in action for us. Did we manage to sell him?

  5. #15
    Member IBK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Highgate, London
    Posts
    4,011
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by GB. View Post
    Not when you factor in wages.
    Agreed - Wenger's blind spot!
    Putting the laughter back into manslaughter

  6. #16
    Member IBK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Highgate, London
    Posts
    4,011
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BoringBoringArsenal View Post
    We just might be ahead of the pack, especially when we narrow it down to our stature, where we're said to one of the supposed 'big' clubs.

    Not sure any other 'big' club has so many of its players out on loan simply because they turned out to be massive slags who the club can never sell for one reason or the other.

    We have a player named Park whom, personally, I can't recall ever seeing in action for us. Did we manage to sell him?
    Reckon it might be the reason why they are on loan. Other clubs seem to sign or develop project players and loan them out. We seem to sign players intended for the first team and then have no choice but to loan them to try to cut losses when they fail.
    Putting the laughter back into manslaughter

  7. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,984
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by IBK View Post
    Gervinho £10,600,000
    Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain £12,000,000
    Joel Campbell £950,000
    Park Chu-Young £3,000,000
    André Santos £6,200,000
    Mikel Arteta £10,000,000
    Per Mertesacker £10,000,000

    Some fairly chunky fees in there?
    Some may disagree with the "chunky" bit because some of those figures are peanuts in modern football terms. But I'm inclined to agree with you based on what we got for those monies.

    Frankly, most of those shouldn't be here even if they were for free.
    Last edited by Özil's Panoramic View; 26-02-2013 at 09:33 PM.

  8. #18
    Member IBK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Highgate, London
    Posts
    4,011
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BoringBoringArsenal View Post
    Some may disagree with the "chunky" bit because some of those figures are peanuts in modern football terms! But I'm inclined to agree based on what we got for those monies.

    Frankly, most of those shouldn't be here even if they were for free.
    "Chunky" referred to what we tend to pay...
    Putting the laughter back into manslaughter

  9. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,984
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by IBK View Post
    "Chunky" referred to what we tend to pay...
    Oh sorry, left off the 'with you' after the '...agree ...' there.

  10. #20
    Pat Rice LDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    17,723
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wenget plays the odds. Everything he does is based on percentages and risk. From injuries, to squad depth, to player positions and tatics.

    Its the same with transfer fee versus player potential. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, but he has unwittingly lowered the level of quality in doing so.
    It's better to burn out, than to fade away.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •