bear in mind that signing suarez is good for us in other ways to, it means liverpool will have to go in and break soldado's contract clause leaving spurs with no chance of signing a reasonable striker
Depends on how much the club wants to dig it's heals in, according to what we've heard they don't like what we've done which will make them even more determined not to sell to us. They may even tell Suarez he can leave next summer and to stay one more year. There's ways of keeping players, as with Tevez eventually they realise not playing is doing them no favours and do a u-turn.
He's under contract, Liverpool want a certain amount they could get other clubs involved by proposing swap deals that suit both parties. Not forgetting of course we could easily not agree to Suarez wage demands, there's more than one way to skin a cat.
We need a lot more than Suarez next season.
I love this bit on the BBC story:
So he believes, but he's not sure either. His representatives aren't sure, he's not sure and yet they were the ones involved when he signed for Liverpool.Suarez believes Arsenal's offer of just over £40m
Was this a secret clause you have to uncover in a game of deal or no deal or something?
Higuain had this sense of Arshavin to him, in that he'd be more likely to turn fat and play shit.
Suarez is a proven player over here.
I'd still have Higuain, but Suarez is the better player.
And left he has. If Suarez wants to leave then as it gets closer, he'll put more pressure on the club. I can't really work out why you're suggesting clubs hold the power over players, we all know they don't.
Exchange deals are a red herring, in that they rarely occur.