the squad van persie carried was imo weaker then the one we have now, so signing suarez makes us stronger then the team with van persie and yes i do agree van persie is the best striker , but suarez as a player is second best striker in the premiership IMO. and also van persie only gave us one fully fit season, so thats also why we might not have challanged as much.
in terms of the squad, with van persie. the forward line was him, theo, chamkh, bentner. assuming we get suarez, its him, giroud, podolski, theo. thats much better.
in midfield, we've added cazorla. jack and ramsey have devolped more, ox too. rosicky looks brilliant everytime he plays, arteta is fantastic too. add in bernard instead of gervinho (if that happens) again we look stronger. also, we can spend on midfield, i htink we should. but i wonder if we are waiting for fabregas, thats 25 million pound deal if united get a bid accepted. now i know you will say why come here, we dont win trophies, but it seems suarez is interested in joining us, and he won a trophy with liverpool. also you have fellani buy out clause for 22 (?) million. we can get both suarez and a midfielder. i think we would challenge then
defence. well its the same defence really but after last season not much to be worried about compared to other areas. it was fantastic last year. opta put this stat out yesterday, only two teams won every game they took the lead in last season. one of them was us. so we can defend leads, its getting leads that are the problem. focus money on attack then.
using your neymar point, hes completely unproven in the league. so suarez is a better shout.