
Originally Posted by
Arse n Wonga
I never said he wasn't a good player though (clearly he is) and as far as being worth the money, in this scenario he's worth what Liverpool deem him to be worth as he's got a contract which has gone a while to run and Liverpool don't want to sell, so in that sense he's worth 50 million.
Do I think he's actually worth spending 50 million on though, no, I don't think he's that good that he's worth the 50 million, that kind of money for me is the sort of money we should pay someone who is special and for someone who has marketability (as mentioned before someone like Neymar is much more marketable).
So yes I think he's very good (he scored a lot of goals last season) but I do think based on one season and his disciplinary record that kind of money is more than we should be paying as the team needs far more than one player. The other thing is and what you guys seem to ignore, it's all very good right now when he's kicking up a fuss at another club, but come a year or two he'll do the same to us and he'll get himself banned again as well, he's a troublemaker....and whilst he appeals now when we get screwed over it won't feel so good.
Incidentally I do think we need a striker to finish off the chances and I stand by the point I made, however if we signed him whilst he would improve the team it wouldn't be a magic recipe for success, he's suspended for 6 games and one player isn't going to solve our problems, the level of the team needs raising across the board. As mentioned before this would be returning us to a level when we had RVP and whilst he scored lots of goals we never won anything then either because we lacked quality in other areas.