
Originally Posted by
Terry Tuffnutz
sure a manager on the high street but that has no relevance here, as i keep stating, his level is equivalent to a lower level director. it's unbelievable that you think someone would invest and let someone lower down control their strategy. it is a business, don't forget that.
what you're doing here is confusing their belief in his strategies that have returned stacks of money for shareholders to flog off, with the idea that he is dictating it all. put in simple terms, the board and the manager agree on many many things, so why would they be blocking his ideas around the pitch?
selective quoting from that link. he says that he would go if undermined and that he has control of all the technical aspects (ie the team). that doesn't mean he tells the board what to spend, if they say no, then it's no but it probably hasn't happened much, as he likes to do it all on the cheap and they love it.