User Tag List

Page 7 of 40 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 396

Thread: Udinese v Arsenal Wednesday 24th August 19:45

  1. #61
    King Kong Boss's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,252
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In an ideal world, we'd sell Nasri for 25M and then reinvest that fully to buy someone of similar quality (Mata, Sneijder, Schweinsteiger). Repeat for Fabregas.

    This isn't an ideal world, we already have roughly 26M profit made from this summer burning a hole in Wenger's pocket, even if Nasri goes for just 20M, can anyone see Wenger splashing out 46M on top quality players?

    Unlikely. We're more than likely to start the season with what we have or buy lower than acceptable quality (someone like Scott Dann), for which we don't need Nasri's fee at all.

    Sure, it's silly to make a 25M loss in business terms, but how does the club netting 25M benefit the fans? It does not benefit us in any way at all.

    If ticket prices came down, there would be some kind of excuse but they've risen by 6.5% this year, a move that nets the club only 4.5M and has pissed off 60,000 people. Despite the club probably banking at least 30M in profit this window, very little of that will be spent on anything that boosts the fans.

    Nasri's still our best attacking midfielder and he is a professional. You can't slaughter his attitude for dropping off in the second half of the season and then ignore fan darlings like Wilshere, Walcott, Sagna, Djourou etc who did the same.

    In conclusion, a quality player on the pitch (even for just a year) > the board making 25M profit which we'll never see.

    The King Is Back.

  2. #62
    King Kong Boss's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,252
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Joker View Post
    If we keep him, he'll most likely sulk and won't give a 100%. Yes, he played quite well against Liverpool but that was in anticipation of a move to City coming up in the next week. If he's forced to stay a whole season with us, I doubt you'd get the same commitment. Wenger should for once put aside his ego and stop trying to make a point and see what's right for the club.
    Absolutely no basis for that. You might even see double the commitment next season as he'd have his pick of clubs to choose from and would be able to command the package he likes if he puts in stellar performances.

    Let's not forget that one of the players who's showed the most commitment (on the field) for the club in the last ten years is one of the most disloyal players to have played football - Mathieu Flamini.

    The King Is Back.

  3. #63
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Squeaky bum time for Stan.

  4. #64
    Wibble Coney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Boss View Post
    Absolutely no basis for that. You might even see double the commitment next season as he'd have his pick of clubs to choose from and would be able to command the package he likes if he puts in stellar performances.

    Let's not forget that one of the players who's showed the most commitment (on the field) for the club in the last ten years is one of the most disloyal players to have played football - Mathieu Flamini.
    I think that's right - Even if we make him stay a year when he'd rather go, he knows it would be in his interest to advertise his skills as he might get even better offers from clubs in a year who won't have to pay the transfer fee.

    In conclusion, a quality player on the pitch (even for just a year) > the board making 25M profit which we'll never see.
    Agreed - If the 25 million we would have got for him goes missing because we keep him for a year, that is better than him going now for 25 millions that will dissappear into the ether.

  5. #65
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Supposedly Nasri is only cup tied if he plays and we win. If we lose he isn't cup tied.

    Does that change anything?

  6. #66
    King Kong Boss's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,252
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wilshere not fit enough to play.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2...shere-udinese?

    No Nasri either, hard to see us creating much.

    The King Is Back.

  7. #67
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    31,840
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Boss View Post
    Wilshere not fit enough to play.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2...shere-udinese?

    No Nasri either, hard to see us creating much.
    No change there then

  8. #68
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Boss View Post
    Wilshere not fit enough to play.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2...shere-udinese?

    No Nasri either, hard to see us creating much.
    Game Over.

  9. #69
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,731
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    With Wilshere out we're most likely going out tonight.

  10. #70
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69,086
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Joker View Post
    With Wilshere out we're most likely going out tonight.
    Fuck, before we even play? Game's tomorrow isn't it? They didn't have too much quality up top. If the defence can keep it together we can get a draw out there.
    Für eure Sicherheit

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •