User Tag List

Page 8 of 26 FirstFirst ... 67891018 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 260

Thread: The Bitter Truth?

  1. #71
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    40,626
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie View Post
    Because the cost in terms of players and players wages will always greatly outweigh any money you make from match day revenues, conmercial deals etc.
    You can be sustainable but not if you want to challenge
    OK. So the two options are:
    a) A sugar daddy
    b) A non-sustainable model which at some point will surely collapse a la Leeds.

    No?

  2. #72
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lambeth, London
    Posts
    5,890
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie View Post
    My point is we are trying to do something that is not possible and be self sustaining, it's just not possible in the top echelons in football with the money in football in terms of players wages
    Yeah but there is a middle ground. It's not a choice between having a 120million in the bank or being a 120million in the red.

  3. #73
    Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie
    Guest
    That's exactly it, money wins out...I'm not saying either way is desirable but unless we introduce a transfer and wage cap it's the only way clubs will win.
    I'd rather us be sustainable but we can't expect to have a pot to piss in

  4. #74
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lambeth, London
    Posts
    5,890
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Letters View Post
    I think that's all fair enough.

    What annoys me is all the hyperbole. Wenger is useless, the club is a shambles.

    We clearly have some problems but does everything really have to be so extreme?
    Oh I agree, and I am at times am guilty of going on the extreme attack about Wenger...I do think there is a middle ground, but I do think we have a club are not taking that route...which is kind of what Herbert is touching on.

  5. #75
    Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by selassie View Post
    Yeah but there is a middle ground. It's not a choice between having a 120million in the bank or being a 120million in the red.
    Not when your competing with clubs that spend ridiculous amounts of money, and have your owners tie you up to commercial deals which they are linked into

  6. #76
    Resident Liverpool Fan Shaqiri Is Boss's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    10,759
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie View Post
    Neither Liverpool or Everton are run as a business, we are. And as for Liverpools commercial revenue it is most likely tied into the ownership, much like Man City's sponsorship deal for the stadium.
    As in we're essentially sponsoring ourselves a la Etihad?

  7. #77
    Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by selassie View Post
    Oh I agree, and I am at times am guilty of going on the extreme attack about Wenger...I do think there is a middle ground, but I do think we have a club are not taking that route...which is kind of what Herbert is touching on.
    Again for me the two issues are seperate, I think Wenger can no longer take us forward but it's irrelevant anyway because we don't have the finances to take us forward

  8. #78
    Member Power n Glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie View Post
    Case in point, Mesut Ozil when you consider his transfer few plus his wages plus signing on fee and adds on, I strongly suspect the 120million we supposedly have in reserve would have been mostly used on this.
    How is that possible?

  9. #79
    Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory View Post
    How is that possible?
    43 million transfer fee
    150 grand a week wages over five years = another 40 million
    Plus add ons and signing on fee and you are looking close to 100 million

  10. #80
    Member Power n Glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie View Post
    43 million transfer fee
    150 grand a week wages over five years = another 40 million
    Plus add ons and signing on fee and you are looking close to 100 million
    Yes, wages over 5 years. We don't pay that much outright.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •