Can GW re-sign Cripps ...heck just for the fuck of it.
Can GW re-sign Cripps ...heck just for the fuck of it.
NOTE: The location of this post has been moved and the thread title (which was previously Wenger is Leaving) has been manipulated by a notorious pro-Wenger moderator. What was previously a message that contained no profanity and made a comment on a real life event has now been manipulated by a deliberately provocative title. An old and crude propaganda and censorship technique.
He'd be a fucking millionaire.
He'll definitely need a visa.
Heard he is the force behind Ryan Shawcrosses PR machine
I think your question is extremely interesting and I thought about it a fair bit.
My answer would be yes.
Assumption would be that the major signings now would take into consideration both factors of (a)quality and (b)an adequate squad depth to challenge on the fronts a club like AFC should be challenging on, mainly the PL and CL.
Every signing brings potential benefit and risk to the team. I think the biggest consideration of risk is essentially the 1) 'gelling in' period, inability to adapt (to both the PL and London) and 2) disruption to the existing squad that offsets the benefits of individual brilliances.
Bringing in players early with a long term plan would negate consideration (1), at least in the second season, whilst accentuating consideration (2) in the first season they are brought in. Essentially, consideration (1) can be negated with an early bedding in process but if we were to face a Reyes type of situation, in which adaptation is simply not possible, buying him one season early or later would not have any difference.
I am assuming that this scenario leverages on money that is expected but not realised materially (CL qualification for e.g being a variable) and for this reason, from a financial point of view, this situation will almost certainly never play out. However there is also an argument to be made that the transfer market inflates much more rapidly than the GBP does, but that is difficult to quantify and appreciating assets will always be accrued from a young player's potential rather than through forex dynamics anyway.
I just feel that hedging for success is our best bet to actually compete in that second season, because if we were to go toe to toe with spending with the oil clubs we would probably not be able to compete. We have to rely on footballing translations (in terms of squad synergy) that are not directly correlated with spending to be able to surpass these oil clubs on the pitch.
Of course, I do not have an in depth understanding of AFC's financial model in relation to our competitors' and therefore I am unable to substantiate my response with hard empirical evidence.
Your question is really intriguing and I would love to hear further responses from other posters indeed.
Lampard looks like he may well be joining Man City on a short term loan.
Football is just getting too stupid for its own good now. Fucking pointless.
Last edited by Shaqiri Is Boss; 01-08-2014 at 08:24 PM.