Random Arsenal Shit (When it's not worth starting a thread)

[Cripps]

Who? Name names. Compared with how many posters we had on here at the board's height very, very few who no longer post were actually banned.
And that's a bit rich coming from the person who posted:



And what do you want? You want opposing views on here? In another thread you posted to me



So...you think this board would be better if we didn't have opposing views? That would make for better debate, would it?
If anything the problem I see is that there aren't opposing views. The only acceptable opinion on here is that Wenger is a ****, any variation from that is met with nonsense like the above. And the second of those was a response to a post I made which was a criticism of the board, it wasn't defending them or Wenger in the slightest. Too often people seem to be responding to things I've not said.

This board has gone to the dogs simply because too many posters have left. There haven't been mass bannings of people who disagree with me, were that so there would hardly be anyone left. Those that are left don't seem to be able to debate anything without taking things to extremes.

Cripps

Josh

SWAYR

Just a few of the posters off the top of my head.

As I said, it always seems to be the ones with opposing views, never the pro Wenger ones. And that's because they get into personal duels with you, and you antagonise, poke and add fuel, until the heat gets too much for you then you press the magic button.

Yes the board was quite feisty back then but it was fun and active. Let's have an amnesty and invite people back

#WeWantOurGoonerswebBack

[Niall_Quinn]

I've never seen Letters and Wenger in the same room.

When you put it like that, it all becomes rather obvious.

[Niall_Quinn]

I joined this place in 2011, by that time I wanted Wenger gone

Don’t recall ever being ridiculed, insulted or laughed at (well not for that reason)

What a cunt you are

Ridiculous bloke.

GTFO - go and post somewhere else.

[Letters]

What a cunt you are

Ridiculous bloke.

GTFO - go and post somewhere else.

We don't want any of these anti-Wenger scum on here. Not on my watch

[Cripps]

The board was never the same since charlie got bullied out of here tbh

Chaz

[Letters]

Cripps

Josh

SWAYR

Cripps, yes. That was in 2013 I also banned Mr Singh in 2011 and SWAYR in 2015.
In terms of regular posters, that's it. So that's 3. Those are the only regular posters who I have banned on this board.
I don't know who "Josh" is. There is no user of that name on here. Maybe on the old board.

Cripps in particular was banned multiple times, allowed back multiple times. That pattern is true for other banned posters. It was incredibly difficult to get permanently banned from this place back in the day.

As I said, it always seems to be the ones with opposing views, never the pro Wenger ones. And that's because they get into personal duels with you, and you antagonise, poke and add fuel, until the heat gets too much for you then you press the magic button.

There are 143 posters signed up here who have posted 100 or more times. I've banned 3. All for persistent WUMing or abuse, never for anti-Wenger views.
Your argument is completely undermined by the fact I haven't banned you or anyone else on here who is rabidly anti-Wenger. Zim's still here, isn't he? He is the poster boy for "Wenger Out".

Yes the board was quite feisty back then but it was fun and active. Let's have an amnesty and invite people back
#WeWantOurGoonerswebBack

Almost all the old regular posters are welcome back any time they want. An amnesty isn't needed because only a few regular posters were ever permanently banned.
The only problem with this place is the lack of regular posters, most of the old ones still have active accounts and could come back any time they want.

[Cripps]

Cripps, yes. That was in 2013 I also banned Mr Singh in 2011 and SWAYR in 2015.
In terms of regular posters, that's it. So that's 3. Those are the only regular posters who I have banned on this board.
I don't know who "Josh" is. There is no user of that name on here. Maybe on the old board.

Cripps in particular was banned multiple times, allowed back multiple times. That pattern is true for other banned posters. It was incredibly difficult to get permanently banned from this place back in the day.


There are 143 posters signed up here who have posted 100 or more times. I've banned 3. All for persistent WUMing or abuse, never for anti-Wenger views.
Your argument is completely undermined by the fact I haven't banned you or anyone else on here who is rabidly anti-Wenger. Zim's still here, isn't he? He is the poster boy for "Wenger Out".



Almost all the old regular posters are welcome back any time they want. An amnesty isn't needed because only a few regular posters were ever permanently banned.
The only problem with this place is the lack of regular posters, most of the old ones still have active accounts and could come back any time they want.

As I said, it starts off as being anti Wenger, then when they get into personal duels with you, you press the magic button because you have the power to do so. There's a common denominator of them being anti Wenger and that's ultimately where it all starts. Why are you never banned and its always them, despite you being equally to blame?

Josh- the black dude you met whilst you were in America.

Also what happened to MK? He got banned as well I think.

These posters added character and excitement to the forum. They were controversial but contributed a lot. One by one they got banned and it's bought the place to a standstill.

[Niall_Quinn]

Josh- the black dude you met whilst you were in America.

Oh really?

Do tell more.

[Cripps]

[Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie]

What a cunt you are

Ridiculous bloke.

GTFO - go and post somewhere else.

That’s just your way of being friendly