Originally Posted by
Niall_Quinn
The "foul" by Ozil (where he didn't even touch the diving spud) that prevented a tap-in for what would have been the opening goal was completely ignored by the Biased Broadcasting Commune. When you compare that "foul" with the actual foul that gave us the free kick that led to what should have been our second goal, and then consider how much fuss the pundits made about it the bias becomes very clear. The MOTD coverage was a complete joke, so much so that even Martin Samuel noticed it and commented on how misleading it was. Even Martin Samuel. That's how biased the dirty communists at the BBC are. Not just in sport but with all so-called news. They are the very definition of fake news, worse even than CNN. And this was the conclusion reached by an independent university study analysing coverage of the Gulf war and the fake weapons of mass destruction. The BBC came out as one of the most biased, pro-war "news" sources. Liars, in other words. They lie about everything, even football matches we have all watched with our own eyes. And the filthy scum use officially sanctioned mobsters to put the heat on us if we don't pony up and fund these lies and propaganda.
And like everything, the worse the bias the more trusted the source. The BBC, somehow, still has a global reputation that is mainly positive, despite being exposed time and time again. Football is not such a big deal. Nobody has died from their latest round of bullshit. But it's a useful insight into the main tool they use rto deliver their endless stream of propaganda - omission. What they leave out says everything about them and their motives.
Pure filth. The whole nest should be fumigated.
Reply With Quote