Match Reaction Arsenal 2-2 Cheating Chavs

[Niall_Quinn]

The biased cunt speaks:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/foo...upid-dive.html

Here's the reason the pen was given - the cheat azzzaahhhh diving and screaming. But no ban for him. Not so blind for Wilshere's antics, the biased cunt managed to spot that. What a surprise.

[Globalgunner]

So 3 yellows Poll has the nerve to open his mouth in polite society.
Shut up fool!

[Niall_Quinn]

So 3 yellows Poll has the nerve to open his mouth in polite society.
Shut up fool!

The stupid biased cheating cunt and notorious Man Utd favourite says:

Jack Wilshere should have been sent off for an outrageous dive but luckily for him, referee Anthony Taylor’s view was blocked by a number of players.

The Arsenal midfielder was right to be cautioned in the first half when he brought down Cesc Fabregas with a reckless tackle.

But knowing he was on a yellow card, he was stupid to dive over Andreas Christensen in the second half.

But Jack didn't dive in the box, so no yellow. However, Azzzaaaahhh did dive in the box. Yellow card.

Poll gets it 100% wrong.

He's as consistent as ever.

[GP]

If it's a pen then so is the one on AMN.

[Niall_Quinn]

If it's a pen then so is the one on AMN.

Poll doesn't mention that. Doesn't support his decades long anti-Arsenal narrative.

[Özim]

The stupid biased cheating cunt and notorious Man Utd favourite says:



But Jack didn't dive in the box, so no yellow. However, Azzzaaaahhh did dive in the box. Yellow card.

Poll gets it 100% wrong.

He's as consistent as ever.

There's always a distinction if there's contact, if there's contact and they dive they don't get punished, if they don't get clipped they do.

Wilshere just dived without being touched so there is a difference, although Hazards was certainly a case of making a meal of it to make sure he got the penalty, in the end Bellerin clipped him though so he was entitled to the penalty.

Players don't get punished if a foul is given.

[Niall_Quinn]

There's always a distinction if there's contact, if there's contact and they dive they don't get punished, if they don't get clipped they do.

Wilshere just dived without being touched so there is a difference, although Hazards was certainly a case of making a meal of it to make sure he got the penalty, in the end Bellerin clipped him though so he was entitled to the penalty.

Players don't get punished if a foul is given.

It wasn't a foul. The two players kicked each other's boot. Does it make a difference if it is a boot, rather than say arms brushing as they go up for a header? Not logically or reasonably, but in Taylor's scrambled brain maybe. Taylor just opted to cheat. He does it a lot. I doubt he got a cash stuffed envelope, I think he just does it to be a cunt, like Dean.

[Marc Overmars]

The penalty was soft as hell, it was given because Hazard made a meal of it. If that’s outside the box, I’m not even convinced it’s a free kick.

[Blink 1nce Quince 2wice]

But he made all those runs!

So let’s ignore the fact he was roasted for their 2nd goal. Not his fault of course, only one person to blame.

Do people really expect the full back to cut out every cross that comes in......what about the 3 CB's standing in a line who can't get to the ball before the whatever tart in blue scored...?

[Niall_Quinn]

The penalty was soft as hell, it was given because Hazard made a meal of it. If that’s outside the box, I’m not even convinced it’s a free kick.

Just as we both called the Maitland pen appeal soft at the time, once the replay was seen. What people defending Hazard are really saying is Maitland should have dived into the air screaming and then rolled around a lot. But then when Jack tries it that's frowned on. So it's all a bit confusing. Seems to me is the safest bet is to play for the chavs or Utd and then the pen is guaranteed regardless.