
Originally Posted by
IBK
Problem is that you are approaching Xhaka this season with confirmation bias. You are waiting for things to go wrong with him based on what has happened in the past (btw I agree that he is too slow to be a covering MF for us), and your ideal of what his position requires, and therefore (in my view) failing to acknowledge what is actually an impressive adaptation to a new and much more effective role. The debate on the Manure game highlighted this. Xhaka was criticised for not being Partey - ie able to provide the defensive cover in MF that Partey can - and therefore he was blamed by some for Manure's goals happening down the centre - whereas the reality was that Lokonga was the weak link, not Xhaka.
It may be that he is found wanting against better teams (mind you - Brentford are no pushovers - however we made them look), and without Partey there. But the problem here is that Partey is fairly unique - and we ain't going to find a ready made Partey replacement to come straight into the team for less than £50M, and a Partey back up of sufficient quality isn't going to come as back up.
Over the past season or so, the manager has shown that he understands what is needed to put his vision into practice - yet there have been greater priorities than replacing Xhaka. In other words those with far more knowledge and understanding of the game than me or you have not seen him as the weakest link. So what if Xhaka has had to be moved to get him contributing more effectively (and less riskily) for our team? All teams are a blend. Henderson is a limited technical player for Liverpool but he has worked for them in a MF role. Jorginho divides opinion at Chelsea. The fact that Xhaka has been one of our best performers - and his skill set can be utilised effectively - this season in a new role is a good thing. Not all out players (or all players in any team) need to have pace and power - even in today's EPL.
I respect your views to the contrary, but for me Xhaka has earned the right to wait and see whether he will indeed become a weak link in Arsenal 22, rather than automatically assuming he is one.