If you genuinely believe that we had the money to sign better, more experienced players but chose not to…I don’t know what to tell you. The fact is you can argue over the self sustaining model and say we should have let Kroenke or Usmanov finance those signings, but that’s a different argument entirely.
Also this debate will not be productive if you keep insisting on telling me what I think and in the process ignoring it when I do tell you what I think. If you want to argue a straw man that’s your choice but you absolutely do not require me for that.
What the betting markets think is of no concern to me, I don’t regard us as favourites a) because we’ve played less than half the games and b) we haven’t yet played Man City.
Now if within a month or so we have played City and still maintain a sizeable lead over them, I’ll be singing a completely different tune…but I think it’s premature.
Nothing in your argument has convinced me that there are players out there in all three positions we require that would be available to us and wouldn’t end up in a ridiculous situation on them being on eight year contracts and on twice the amount of money the rest of the squad is on.
If that situation existed and even if it cost us 200 or even 300 million plus and might impact our finances for next year or two, I’d absolutely say go for it. But that situation doesn’t exist, and I expect you know it doesn’t exist.