Quote Originally Posted by Mac76 View Post
I'm actually one of the people to use nuance on here tbh, rather than the usual 'they're shit' / 'they're great' social media standard of football discussion

It's you that talks in absolutes and traps themselves in foolish unequivocal statements about players, likely results and so on
No you really don’t talk in nuance at all

To the point where you seemingly can’t tell the difference between opinion and assertion of fact

To the point where you make unequivocal “you’re wrong” statements about opinions I offer

Take Eze for example, it’s not exactly brimming with nuance to say “oh he has goals and assists so you’re wrong to question his footballing brain”

I’d actually say the way he played on Saturday would be evidence of him having more of a footballing brain than I’ve previously suggested, because it was a complete and clever performance. That’s far more than what I’d ever seen of him previously where he’s been little more than a quick and strong meathead

Then we go on to Gyokeres where you still can’t even admit that there’s no where, where I’ve unequivocally stated he couldn’t make it in the premier league, my argument is that I have profound doubts about it

I’m not the one who claims because Leicester city win the title ten years ago, it unequivocally pisses on the idea that in the main the club with the most money and the best players win things which as consequence makes it so that a manager/head coach isn’t quite as much the difference maker as we think (thus my argument that as long as the squad and the setup is good, who the coach is…isn’t as relevant..I’d argue that both Brighton and to a degree Liverpool are examples of this)

So in respect of your nuance, to paraphrase the Wendy’s advert that Walter Mondale ripped off “where’s the beef?”