It's absurd we're prioritising Madueke over Eze or indeed keeping Nwaneri
Arteta's burning away a lot of whatever capital he has with the fans over this
It's absurd we're prioritising Madueke over Eze or indeed keeping Nwaneri
Arteta's burning away a lot of whatever capital he has with the fans over this
£50m for Maudueke when the Spuds just agreed £55m for Kudus....we seem to have a serious aversion to good deals unless they are practically forced on us (Trossard's deal is the only good one I can think of ATM).Originally Posted by Marc Overmars
It’s strange that Kudus is being allowed to go for 55 million when they had slapped an 80 million price tag on him, however given that Forest have paid 55million for Anthony Elanga who is about the level of Madueke (both of whom are inferior to Kudus currently anyway) it seems more than West Ham have allowed their player to go for cheap
I think anything more than 30 million for Madueke is not worth it, however it’s being reported that it won’t impact buying Eze or a striker (if that’s to be believed)
I’ve just read we’ve offered £45m for madueke and Chelsea want……
£65m
Fucking, fuck the fuck off!!!
And Kiwior and Jorg, plus i think the Kepa and Mosqueta ones seem reasonable
Well if that’s what it takes to stop the transfer Chelsea’s valuation works for me .
agreed, although I still wouldn't put it past Arteta to push for it, he paid the same for Havertz and as I said above, i suspect it's hurting that he lost out to Berta on the striker option
A work mate Hammers supporter is gutted that they are selling Maudueke, especially to the spuds.
So I’m confusedA work mate Hammers supporter is gutted that they are selling Maudueke, especially to the spuds.
Does your West Ham supporting mate not know much about football and think Madueke is their player rather than Kudus
Or did you put Madueke rather than Kudus by accident? (Easily done given we’ve been talking about him)
My mistake
I meant Kudus.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote