User Tag List

Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 78910 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 96

Thread: Is Wenger right about Walcott?

  1. #81
    Member Kano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    10,319
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Loblaw View Post
    Wenger's tactics are suspect if they exist at all, but I doubt they involve telling Theo to run into offside positions whenever we are on the attack.
    He threw back the years with today's performance on his decade anniversary. Played just like a 16-year-old.

  2. #82
    bye Xhaka Can’t's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    15,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Playing him is senseless. End of story.

    Ten fucking years of next to nothing from him.

  3. #83
    Goat Balls fakeyank's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Punjab
    Posts
    7,009
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    He cannot control the ball to save his life. That should be a basic minimum for someone playing professional football. It is even worse when you are on the wing and he is just atrocious.
    Arsene Wenger, the only football manager that got paid 8 million quid to do nothing but sit on his arse..

  4. #84
    MOe Marc Overmars's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    32,471
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've been a supporter of his in the past and I do think he can be a useful option, but it's no good being useful 1 in 10 games. If that.

    He's so limited and if we're not going to extract what use he does have (running in behind) out of him then there's no point of him being on the pitch.

  5. #85
    Member Power n Glory's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    14,195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    He has to be a striker or nothing at all. He has zero going for him on the wing. Zero.

  6. #86
    bye Xhaka Can’t's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    15,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory View Post
    He has to be a striker or nothing at all. He has zero going for him on the wing. Zero.
    He truly excels at that.

  7. #87
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lambeth, London
    Posts
    5,892
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd drop him to the bench for Alexis next game. His recent performances from the wing have been shameful. He can take his mate Ramsey with him too, both of them have been stinking up the joint.

  8. #88
    Member Master Splinter's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    24,496
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Walcunt.

  9. #89
    ***** Niall_Quinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    69,086
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Master Splinter View Post
    Walcunt.
    Cunt for short
    Für eure Sicherheit

  10. #90
    Member IBK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Highgate, London
    Posts
    4,102
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory View Post
    The tactic was to get in behind their defenders and hit them on the counter. Sometimes it doesn't work out and were weren't creating much today. The passing was off today.

    My main gripe with Theo and the tactics was him still playing on the left after Giroud went off. Senseless.
    This. At the time, I thought that given Chelsea's susceptibility to pace this season, sacrificing Giroud when Mertesacker went was understandable. The fact that we then conceded anyway, and allowed a Chelsea team to sit back, get bodies behind the ball and simply play long balls through on the break meant that Walcott was nullified. Because he does not have Giroud's ability to find the net when under pressure in a crowded penalty area. Walcott suits a particular style of play that is more open and counter-attacking. Did we play a high line because we don't have the MF solidity to sit back and play more on the counter? The choice of personnel and the playing style are just not joining up for us lately, and I think Theo is a victim of this.
    Putting the laughter back into manslaughter

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •