Random Arsenal Shit (When it's not worth starting a thread)

[Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie]

Trouble is he voices it publicly so I'm not sure that so true in this scenario, this guy is so deluded though, as NQ said he doesn't support Arsenal he supports AW, despite years of evidence proving he's not up to it anymore and makes a lot of errors, that's ignoring the fact that Ty acknowledged we needed a striker and that AW was definitely buying one in the summer, low and behold no striker.

He also talks about if we don't get too many injuries, well as we all know that's pretty much an impossibility, 10 years of the same should teach these people something, we'll get loads of injuries as usual, in fact we already have plenty and the season hasn't even started so how the guy has the audacity to even say that is beyond me.

I think you are confusing calling someone's opinion wrong...which of course everyone has the right to do, and thinking someone shouldn't have the right to hold a certain opinion and that they should believe something else.

[Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie]

I agree Claude is a troubled soul with only Arsenal in his life, to some extent you can overlook some of the stuff he says, but that Ty guy has no excuse, he just supports the manager and not the club, as long as the manager stays he's happy, it's kinda weird.

He doesn't have to have an excuse, he's not the one who constantly rants and raves and swears and makes enigmatic references to ending it all on social media.....he simply holds an opinion that you or I think is totally misguided and has no grounding in reality.

[Özim]

I think you are confusing calling someone's opinion wrong...which of course everyone has the right to do, and thinking someone shouldn't have the right to hold a certain opinion and that they should believe something else.

I'm saying that if you voice your opinions publicly then you will be judged on them much more than if you voice them to to people you know, this guy seems happy with the exposure, but his views are very extreme and will be heavily scrutinised, if you have extreme points of view, as much as it's your right, it's usually best not to voice them to everyone via the media, because to many you may come across as a little nuts.

[Özim]

He doesn't have to have an excuse, he's not the one who constantly rants and raves and swears and makes enigmatic references to ending it all on social media.....he simply holds an opinion that you or I think is totally misguided and has no grounding in reality.

If he voice's it on media however, he's not just telling people he knows.

[Letters]

I appreciate Claude has a lot of demons, but ultimately whose fault it is if he has nothing in his life than Arsenal?

Wait...I know this one. Wenger? Is it Wenger?

[Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie]

If he voice's it on media however, he's not just telling people he knows.

Again you seem to think that i am stating he shouldn't be the subject of ridicule, that's in no way what i am saying

What i find more interesting is the anger he seems to generate, as somehow he has less right to express that opinion because it's considered to be ridiculous

To turn what you've said on it's head , Claude clearly has mental health issues and has nothing else going on in his life that's why he's so angry with Ty....what's your excuse?

[Özim]

Again you seem to think that i am stating he shouldn't be the subject of ridicule, that's in no way what i am saying

What i find more interesting is the anger he seems to generate, as somehow he has less right to express that opinion because it's considered to be ridiculous

To turn what you've said on it's head , Claude clearly has mental health issues and has nothing else going on in his life that's why he's so angry with Ty....what's your excuse?

Claude makes valid points at times based on how we perform, Ty never does, it's always blind support which isn't based on anything tangible, that's the difference hence the reason I ask what's his excuse.

[Letters]

He doesn't need an excuse. He's allowed an opinion as are we all. The only difference is he expresses his more publicly and is thus more subject to ridicule.

[Herbert_Chapman's_Zombie]

Claude makes valid points at times based on how we perform, Ty never does, it's always blind support which isn't based on anything tangible, that's the difference hence the reason I ask what's his excuse.

My point is his opinions to you are nonsensical (they are to me in truth)

The difference is i don't get angry or annoyed for him expressing them, Claude's excuse for doing it is his depressive mindset...what is yours?

[Özim]

My point is his opinions to you are nonsensical (they are to me in truth)

The difference is i don't get angry or annoyed for him expressing them, Claude's excuse for doing it is his depressive mindset...what is yours?

I don't angry, I just think he's deluded and it's people like him who stop change occurring.