The worrying thing about Gervinho is that reports in France say he's always been like that and he's much older than Theo.
Theo's been here 5 years, since he was 16 and he's now in his early 20s. Besides Cesc, how many players have come through our system at that age and really shone?
But what are you seeing on the pitch and what have you heard about him from his days in France?
All well and good quoting the stats but from what I've seen and heard about him, he's a bit hit and miss with his finishing. As one fan described, the type to infuriate and thrill at the same time.
Also worth taking a look at his goal record when he was in his early 20's and compare that to Theo's. Days before he joined Lille.
Last edited by Power n Glory; 05-10-2011 at 10:36 AM.
To diffrent players though in to diffent roles. Theo is a striker and has always been but has not developed for some reason, where as gev is an attacking Midfilder and was bought as one. The only reason he plays as a second stiker is because we never bought a top striker like we should off.
Totally agree with that but both play as wingers. Gervinho doesn't play as a second striker and we don't play a second striker system either. We've got one central player and two wingers/attacking midifielders that attack from wide position but can also drift in and swap positions.