Originally Posted by
Niall_Quinn
Are you saying Trump WOULDN'T have won without the mainstream media?
Have you ever stopped to consider that what Trump campaigned on is what he intends to do, or try to do? He hasn't been inclusive towards illegal immigrants. What's wrong with that, if we consider things from the viewpoint of state and the law? He hasn't been inclusive of immigrants arriving from Muslim nations that can't be properly vetted, what's wrong with that in terms of security considering the number of attacks Muslim fanatics have perpetrated against civilian targets in the west?
Women, blacks, legal immigrants. What policies does he have that exclude these people? If anything, I rated him a little too inclusive of blacks and latinos, it sounded to me like they were in line for special policies and favouritism. Understandable maybe, as these communities have fallen behind under years of Democratic neglect of the inner cities. But the opposite of the accusations of non-inclusiveness nonetheless.
It seems to me that most liberals don't actually know what Trump's policies are. Instead they have listened to far-spun distortions leveraged by the leftist mainstream media. The idea Trump is a racist, a bigot or a misogynist is preposterous. A rich, privileged, brash playboy type surrounded by gold-diggers - sure. But beyond that there's not a shred of proof of any of the slander that has been thrown at him.
Where are all these women who accused him during the campaign, btw? Shouldn't it be a big thing that a man guilty of all these abuses against women is now the president elect? That shit seems to have fallen off the scope. I wonder why? Indeed several of the women have retracted their claims already, and it appears they aren't going to be prosecuted. Well they should be.
Trump is many things, some of them unpleasant. But only fools with an agenda or deep bitterness and resentment of the election result believe the bullshit hype being pushed by the now exposed and discredited mainstream media.