The best time to judge a season is after 1 game, which we lost ergo the season is over.Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn
The best time to judge a season is after 1 game, which we lost ergo the season is over.
True. Because Wenger has only been in charge for 1 game so who can possibly tell how he'll do over, say, a decade?
Für eure Sicherheit
Got the DVD of Anfield '89. Boring game. Turned off at half time. Can't believe we didn't win the league that year
So basically, judge him at the end of the season? Yeah, we heard the first time. And the second, third, fourth, fifth... Round and around we go, where we'll stop? Everyone knows!Got the DVD of Anfield '89. Boring game. Turned off at half time. Can't believe we didn't win the league that year
Für eure Sicherheit
Second fact of the day: Wumger inherited the best back 5 this country has ever seen.
Did any of those play in 2004?
EDIT: No, not really. Only Keown was inherited and he only started 3 games...
Lehman (38)
Cole (32)
Lauren (30+2)
Cygan (10+8)
Clichy (7+5)
Campbell (35)
Toure (36+1)
Keown (3+7)
No. Judge the season at the end. Obviously.
Judge Wenger when you like.
This isn't rocket salad...
Because Wenger and the outcome of our season aren't really related.
Für eure Sicherheit
Of course they're related, but you can only properly judge a game when it's over, you can only properly judge a season when it's over.
I shouldn't have to explain this to someone who does coding and therefore should be fairly conversant with logic.
Why should this season be any different to the previous 10 ?
We perform to a high standard under Wenger like getting in the top four every season, something that a lot of clubs would love to do, but we have not actually won the PL since the landscape changed when the Russian arrived at Chelsea.
Top four yes but winning, no chance.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote