Everyone wants to win, some people however take winning more seriously than others.
Wenger is a "if I win great, if not nevermind" kinda guy.
Everyone wants to win, some people however take winning more seriously than others.
Wenger is a "if I win great, if not nevermind" kinda guy.
This?Originally Posted by Power_n_Glory
This is what you took from Super Ghels "Why FakeYank is a Mong" post?
Part of it you ass!
And in choosing to address only part you miss the overall point.
I think you should read the last three paragraphs of his post again. The part asks 'why Wenger should consider resigning'.
Can't be bothered.
And you've got the nerve to question my overall understanding of his post.
You haven't got a clue what he said, admit it.
Why do you want to do this to yourself FY? You were doing just fine earlier when you gave in to your logical sensibilities and should have just stopped there to be honest. In hindsight, now nobody can be sure if the non-mong declaration that you’ve signed earlier is the appropriate option for you any longer since your reply above clearly demonstrates your deductive prowess is no better than that of some demented, butthurt or confused soul with little to offer other than an amazing display of cerebral haemorrhage <--(go whip out your Anglo-Bengal dictionary if you must; not my problem).
Seriously, what the hell does my rich diverse vocabulary have anything to do with your incessant parroting of Wenger bashing points, which I’m not even arguing? Did you not read what I wrote? BOTH Wenger and the board are to be blamed! I am not absolving Arsene of anything! How many ways do I need to repeat myself before that point finally sifts thru your disproportionately thick cranium?
Just because I chose not to join in with the mindless foray of Wenger bashing (which has been repeated ad nauseam) does not mean I don’t hold him responsible! If laying into Wenger helps ease your mental constipation; then fine, carry on until you turn blue for all I care. That’s not the point I was making. What I’m saying is; if you continue to lay into Wenger but is OK with cutting the board some slack; then it is perfectly legitimate for any neutral person to objectively conclude that YOU ARE A MONG! So, unless that you are disputing that logical stance, then nothing has changed here, if you’re still missing the big picture.
Again, what is with your obsession with the manner in which I express myself? Did my choice of words or colourful vocabulary stung you that much; it was your sad attempt at some sort of comeback sarcasm? Well, if that is the extent of your wit, then let me just say this: It is so pathetically lame that the only way you’re going to get a rise out of me is this: (picture me lending a sympathetic hand to your cause by raising my arm and tickling my armpit furiously with a feather).
Your selective quoting and pathetic attempt above at trying to spin your retarded inferences on me is another cringeworthy display of epic proportions. Look, that snippet is NOT a blanket statement by me to postulate whether or not Arsene has any ambition footballistically; but rather the viewpoint of a neutral perspective to determine: who is the mong here (you or the Board) and whose whims Arsene should cater to first!
Like I said, if you want to bleat on like a parrot and beat Arsene to a pulp before you can regain any inklings of sanity; carry on, but it still does not change the logical conclusion of an impartial observer that you’re a mong if you think the board is the sensible party here and not the main problem! To the neutral observer, it is well within Arsene’s right and prerogative if he believes he gets more job satisfaction out of doing the right thing by listening to, or even have his manhood constantly serviced by the clued-up people (who you support as the non-mongs in this equation), and get handsomely rewarded in the process. Get it?? Goddamn! It is amusing to see the embarrassing levels of mental constipation being exhibited here by certain posters when someone doesn’t go on some mindless crusade against Wenger.
Look FY, temped as I am to deliver another can of whoop ass (though the novelty does wear out quite quickly since it’s evidently so one sided), but unless you intend to dispute the logical argument that from a neutral perspective that you are a MONG; then there’s hardly any point of us engaging further in this activity because it’s damn obvious to any impartial onlooker here, there is a huge glaring disparity between us in terms of basic cognitive ability. Jeez why do I even bother wasting my time like this, I’ll never know.
Your empathy towards the board above is exactly the point I was trying to make! Instead of wasting my time typing, I’ll just refer you to the following important extract of my post:
Look, I have no problems at all with the Wenger bashing. It’s fair game to me and some of it, quite justifiably so. But I draw the line where cutting the board some slack is concerned, because the significance of logical due process takes precedence as far as I am concerned (regardless of how justifiably inclined you may feel otherwise).What is the fucking point of bleating on endlessly about Wenger, if at the end of the day, you are prepared to cut the board some slack, give them time or whatever it is you think is appropriate (be it trying to understand their point of view, empathise with their motives or whatever it is you feel they’re entitled to)? Because if you do so, then any impartial person who is trying to evaluate the situation objectively from a neutral perspective has the right and is legitimately of sound mind, to conclude that you are a mong! It’s simple deduction based on the principle of logical consistency. If you do not apportion the majority of blame towards the board first (regardless of how justified you feel that Wenger is the problem), then from a logical standpoint, there is little, to no consistency in your argument compared to the board’s absolutely symmetrical stance on the subject.
So here are the facts to any neutral observer: In one corner we have the board/owner who are in control of the club; whose stance on the subject is crystal clear and consistent. They are firmly behind their employee of the decade and regard you, the Wenger out clan as mongs. And in the other corner, we have you, the dependable Wenger out hit squad, who makes no counter claim or dispute to the board’s assertion that you are mongs (either by abstinence or implied level of blame) but chose to focus your anguish on the one person in the equation who has no power of self-appointment to keep this travesty in a perpetual loop. Then tell me, how is any neutral, objective person supposed to resolve the conundrum since the views of both camps (You vs. Board) are diametrically opposed to each other? Who is right and who is the mong? Don’t you see, regardless of who you feel is more to blame, if you are not prepared to target the board as the source of the problem, but want Wenger out of the club ASAP, there’s only one logical verdict to any unbiased observer?
The only other person in this forum who I can recall off the top of my head who shares my kind of aversion to the Board and their ‘sort’ is brilliant Mr Niall Quinn. Maybe it’s because I think we’re both roughly at the same level of experience in terms of having accumulated enough of that kind of déjà vu familiarity and so are naturally inclined to an immediate suspicion of that sort of devious cunning running in the background, which the masses are blissfully oblivious to. But I digress. Anyways, my point is if you’re the sort who gets off repeatedly by dumping your excrement on a picture of Arsene in the privacy of your home and have no problem of being perceived as a mong from the viewpoint of a neutral third party, then the prerogative is entirely yours.
Ha, a wise one who can see the picture and read between the lines. I like.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote