Scott Parker Thread

[Olivier's xmas twist]

There is no need to edit this post is there?

GB
Me

[Flavs]

NAh he's pretty shit.

And so was Dave Mackay.

Fuckin uber LOL

[Ollie the Optimist]

think frimpong and coqulein will be better then him. and just cos harry says he is amazing after a good game against qpr doesnt mean he is

[Olivier's xmas twist]

think frimpong and coqulein will be better then him. and just cos harry says he is amazing after a good game against qpr doesnt mean he is

Their not english so they will never be

[Japan Shaking All Over]

The same parker who led West ham to relegation, then bolted at the 1st sign. No thanks rather have Coq tbh.

Shit Charlie. . .dicing with death aren't. . . .lucky you didnt use the small check

[Japan Shaking All Over]

Ok but remember we didn't have half the squad we have now against Man Utd, so if we did sign him it would have been after that game anyway.

Also who would you drop? Arteta seems to be performing the battling role quite well and Song is doing well in putting out fires and getting assists and goals.

I think Song would have been the one looking over his shoulder!

If we had brought in Parker, he would have automatically jumped in Songs place after the Newcastle game and the start of Songs ban. . . .and it coukd have very much have been Song waiting for his chance as I imagine Parker would havw kept him out the team.
You pay for your mistakes and Song may well have still been paying but as MO said it history but we really should think harder when presented with a similar situation

The guy would have been an ideal addition, whether it were he or Song starting, it would have been handy having one of them on the bench. Title winning squafs have depth, the ability to rest players, Parker would not have been bought to play 42+ games, he would have been bought to provide quality back up/option. . .yes he was captain of WHU when they got relegated, he didnt lead them to relegation! The whole squad did that. . .but what his performances did lead him to was the writers player of the year. . .not a bad player after all

[Olivier's xmas twist]

Shit Charlie. . .dicing with death aren't. . . .lucky you didnt use the small check

Still rather have Coqulein and song

[Olivier's xmas twist]

I think Song would have been the one looking over his shoulder!

If we had brought in Parker, he would have automatically jumped in Songs place after the Newcastle game and the start of Songs ban. . . .and it coukd have very much have been Song waiting for his chance as I imagine Parker would havw kept him out the team.
You pay for your mistakes and Song may well have still been paying but as MO said it history but we really should think harder when presented with a similar situation

The guy would have been an ideal addition, whether it were he or Song starting, it would have been handy having one of them on the bench. Title winning squafs have depth, the ability to rest players, Parker would not have been bought to play 42+ games, he would have been bought to provide quality back up/option. . .yes he was captain of WHU when they got relegated, he didnt lead them to relegation! The whole squad did that. . .but what his performances did lead him to was the writers player of the year. . .not a bad player after all

Its all good and till he gets injured again. we have more then enough injury prone players why add another 1