Transfer targets in January

[Cripps_orig]

we don't need him(even though id have liked him here) do you think he'd be happy to be 2nd choice.

Yes we do and with our injuries, he'll play his fair share

[Grebbo]

we don't need him(even though id have liked him here) do you think he'd be happy to be 2nd choice.

Why would he be second choice?

Almost every position in our first team can be improved. If we want to be a top team then we must strive for better.

[Japan Shaking All Over]

Van der Wiel would not be a bad signing. . .first choice him and Sagna - back up Santos and Jenko. . .sorry Gibbo but the injuries. . .you know!


Footnote: even though there are still 25 days till the end of the month, someone should mention to AW that he doesnt HAVE to wait till the last minute before doing any business!

[LDG]

Van der Wiel would not be a bad signing. . .first choice him and Sagna - back up Santos and Jenko. . .sorry Gibbo but the injuries. . .you know!


Footnote: even though there are still 25 days till the end of the month, someone should mention to AW that he doesnt HAVE to wait till the last minute before doing any business!

Hey!

We all know we have to observe the waiting period

[Japan Shaking All Over]

Still waiting! ?

[Olivier's xmas twist]

Why would he be second choice?

Almost every position in our first team can be improved. If we want to be a top team then we must strive for better.

Because Wenger won't play him infront of Sagna will he, and the lad will want to play games.

[GP]

Hey!

We all know we have to observe the waiting period

[Grebbo]

Because Wenger won't play him infront of Sagna will he, and the lad will want to play games.

Well yeah he will if he's better than Sagna! (Well a normal manager would)

[Japan Shaking All Over]

Well yeah he will if he's better than Sagna! (Well a normal manager would)

Isnt Van der Wiel a LB and Sagna a RB?

Both would be starters!

[Cripps_orig]

Van Der Wiel is a right back