thing is, I can see why the board are staying so silent. in my opinion it would be absolute lunacy if the shareholders were not thinking of capitalising on the growth potential our club obviously has - the idea of asset stripping makes little sense when there is so much more to be made long term and asset stripping usually occurs when a company is heading towards the junkyard.
the analysis of the accounts have been made by various people indicating there is money to spend yet we seem reluctant to do so and i am of the believe that it is being pushed somewhere else for use. we see it in cold black and white but that does not take into account any internal plans they have for this money, which at the moment clearly isn't being thrown at team investment.
we are told that there is money to spend yet we don't see it so it is all about image. why would they tell everyone the have no money to spend, ruin the perception of the club? so the fans should be told the truth right? well like any large corporate company, they wouldn't reveal inner secrets to their customers full in the believe that they will always buy what they sell and it applies even more to the football world.
as the article says, we are due for more of the same if wenger leaves this summer so i would really like to see who could take on the role and perform better under this circumstances.