Aaaand... the bitch is finished. Now hire a bloke to do a bloke's job. Men play football. Women play netball. And everyone actually fucking knows tat. But they are too pussy whipped to say it.
Aaaand... the bitch is finished. Now hire a bloke to do a bloke's job. Men play football. Women play netball. And everyone actually fucking knows tat. But they are too pussy whipped to say it.
Für eure Sicherheit
Not sure you can accuse others of being triggered when you’ve had a full breakdown on here over a woman presenting a football showOriginally Posted by Niall_Quinn
Watch Sky right now you fag. And see what a man's game looks like.
Für eure Sicherheit
Wow, someone was on their second bottle of the hard stuff early today
What a loser
Sober as a judge. And I haven't even molested any children yet.
All you have, you epic cunt, is the character - never the message. Just post cat pictures. Do yourself a massive favour.
Für eure Sicherheit
What you have to ask yourself is why you care?
I have zero interest in women’s football for example, never have never will. I do troll people a bit about it because that’s just how I am. But it’s of no consequence to me…if they win a tournament great…good for them.
Now I’m sure you agree most male pundits and commentators currently employed are completely useless, just the same tired old platitudes from people who either can’t get over their club allegiance or are incapable of holding an original thought in their head…it’s that kind of mindless lack of insight that allowed Jermaine Jenas to make a seamless transition to the One Show.
Ultimately it’s not worth listening to. I love watching games either on mute or in the pub where the noise in the pub is so loud I can’t hear what’s being said anyway.
Im not interested in what this woman has to say because I’m not interested in what any of them have to say. Who Skysports pay to waffle on is their own look out.
I'll tell you why - because I don't want pedophilia to become legal and fashionable. And yes, there's a LONG way to go from here to there but it's all interconnected. You have to disassemble every norm before a new norm can be established. Is women commenting on mens' sports a big deal in isolation - of course not. Irritating, yes. A fundamental threat to our way of life? No. But as one cut in a thousand cuts - it's still a cut and should still be called out. Like the so-called athletics authorities refusing to ban trannies from women's sport. This tells you the shit going on has nothing to do with equality but everything to do with disruption.
Anyway, I watched an episode of Saint and Greavesie (used to loathe those bastards) dated back to the opening day of the season right after we'd done the business at Anfield. It's on YouTube. Have a watch. Hilarious and nobody died.
Real women are perfectly able to fight their own corner btw. They don't need the approval or favours of simpering beta males.
Für eure Sicherheit
So all roads that deviate from the norm ultimately lead to paedophilia being legalised and acceptable?
The problem with that is then you have to establish a norm that can never be deviated from and in a world of constant flux and change that’s kind of setting yourself up to live in a state of perpetual anger and dread.
Now I think I speak for everyone in this group when I say no one wants to see sexual abuse of children ever be de-stigmatised. It’s abhorrent in that the harm it does to the most vulnerable and need of protection is incalculable. As long as I’m alive I will always want it looked upon with fear and revulsion.
Now I think in that sense, that society reflects the attitudes on this board despite the attempt of a fucked up minority to push their views into the mainstream by adopting acronyms like MAP as if it’s just someone being different and not someone who at the least needs psychological intervention or needs castrating and being kept locked away where they can never do harm.
Attitudes change over time of course, I personally think we’ve gone too far in our need to be accepting that we’ve got mainstream politicians advocating for the removal of safeguards that prevent predatory men entering women’s spaces. And whilst you’re right that women do not need cucks to speak up for them on whether they are qualified to do football commentary (they don’t need your validation and compliance…if you think women have no place in men’s football that materially does not affect them) I do think they need more men to stand up to the bearded wokesters who call them bigots for not taking their word for it that trans people mean them no harm (especially in the face of prevailing evidence)
What I generally don’t do is believe that this wooly thinking was the natural consequences of something like allowing gays to marry (although as a freedom of conscience kind of chap, I neither feel the church should be compelled to marry gays or anyone should believe that being gay or a bloke marrying another bloke is ok if that’s not how they feel)
So my attitude is fine be vigilant, there are a few hills I’m prepared to die on but stopppng noncery being acceptable is definitely one. But I personally wouldn’t give my energy to something I don’t give a fuck about but may lead to noncery by a thousand degrees of seperation.
What I’m going to say now goes against many of my ultimately cynical beliefs in human beings but in the main I have faith in people over this, there was an attempt by kiddy diddlers before to gain a foothold by stealth (PIE - Paedophile information exchange) and it failed…any such attempt will fail in future because people never fully lose their sense of smell.
Ultimately in many ways we’ve made positive progress over this, because in the past it wasn’t spoken about and victims of these monsters were told to keep quiet. And it’s one of those examples of sunlight being a good disinfectant
Last edited by HCZ_Reborn; 24-01-2023 at 01:14 PM.
Right. Attitudes in society of course change over time, but I don't buy that there's a clear direction of travel towards the sort of degeneracy which would see paedophilia becoming either legal or fashionable.
Some things have got worse - the level of swearing has increased in society and that's reflected on TV. As a kid it was headline news if someone said "the F word" on TV. Now shows are littered with it, and "the C word" is becoming more common. I regard that as a bad thing although not everyone would agree. Society has become more sexualised, the lyrics and videos for music videos now just wouldn't have been allowed when I was young, the internet has meant that any type of porn is available to anyone at the click of a button, kids are exposed to that far younger than they should be and are far less innocent than they used to be. I think that's bad too.
But other "norms" have been disassembled in a positive way. Racism and homophobia were the norm when I was a kid. The punchline of many jokes was Paddy being thick or someone being gay. Those things are now frowned upon. One could argue some of that goes too far, but overall it's a bit lazy when the punchline is a person being of a certain race or sexuality.
In terms of child abuse, there's far more awareness these days. Youth groups have safeguarding policies in place to make sure children and adults are protected (children protected from abuse, adults from accusations).
Teachers are trained to spot potential signs of abuse at home, none of that was in place when I was a kid. I have to do mandatory training about it at work FFS and my role is literally nothing to do with working with kids and is unlikely to ever be so. I'd suggest we are further as a society from any of this stuff being acceptable than 30 or 40 years ago. Stuff like Minipops on C4, was thought "just a bit of fun" and now we look back on it thinking "yeah, that wasn't great". Not every change in society is a step towards the last days of Rome.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote