User Tag List

Page 124 of 136 FirstFirst ... 2474114122123124125126134 ... LastLast
Results 1,231 to 1,240 of 1359

Thread: Summer Transfers 2025 Missed Opportunities and Regrets

  1. #1231
    Member Mac76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    London
    Posts
    16,787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    fine by me, as above I'm happy with Gyokeres, Isak is a little injury prone and I think to have backtracked on Gyokeres at this stage would have been pretty shoddy IMO, if we'd done it to chase after Isak

  2. #1232
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    11,238
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Mosquera has officially signed

  3. #1233
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,900
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There's an analysis of him on Skysports looks like we've got a quality player.

  4. #1234
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,881
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So an update on all things Madueke:

    https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/651...grown-players/

    So apparently he does qualify as homegrown in the EPL but won't in the CL.

    @IBK

    Also, though it's not been confirmed yet, it seems we actually signed him on the same salary he was at Chelsea i.e. 50k a week, which really surprises me.

    Firstly it makes a little more sense now why our suits rushed the deal...in the long run it's actually not that expensive seeing he's on a 1/3 of the salary of Martinelli and even cheaper than Trossard! So it seems you had a point afterall on us not having enough info on the club's valuation.

    Secondly, though I've been one of his hardest critics and firmly in the camp of "WTF did we do this deal" , I'm taken aback by him personally forsaking his final match (and medal) at the CWC and actively choosing to join us seeing as I seriously doubt now that Chelsea pushed him out, seeing as his wages represent a pittance to them.

    Anyway, let's see what he does on the pitch, but I'm officially wiping the slate clean thanks to this info... that's of course until they reveal the Chav whose been making the "I know what you did last summer" calls and hoarding the dirty pics of Arteta and Kronke jnr at that slumber party

  5. #1235
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    11,238
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    According to the Metro I think it was, we wanted him last summer but the board didn’t want to sanction the move (wasn’t sure about the player) which is probably why we ended up with Sterling instead

  6. #1236
    Member Mac76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    London
    Posts
    16,787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 21_GOONER_SALUTE View Post
    So an update on all things Madueke:

    https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/651...grown-players/

    So apparently he does qualify as homegrown in the EPL but won't in the CL.

    @IBK

    Also, though it's not been confirmed yet, it seems we actually signed him on the same salary he was at Chelsea i.e. 50k a week, which really surprises me.

    Firstly it makes a little more sense now why our suits rushed the deal...in the long run it's actually not that expensive seeing he's on a 1/3 of the salary of Martinelli and even cheaper than Trossard! So it seems you had a point afterall on us not having enough info on the club's valuation.

    Secondly, though I've been one of his hardest critics and firmly in the camp of "WTF did we do this deal" , I'm taken aback by him personally forsaking his final match (and medal) at the CWC and actively choosing to join us seeing as I seriously doubt now that Chelsea pushed him out, seeing as his wages represent a pittance to them.

    Anyway, let's see what he does on the pitch, but I'm officially wiping the slate clean thanks to this info... that's of course until they reveal the Chav whose been making the "I know what you did last summer" calls and hoarding the dirty pics of Arteta and Kronke jnr at that slumber party
    I don't think you can assume Chelsea didn't push him out just because his wages are relatively 'low' - as I've said before my understanding is they need to offload some players in order that newer signings (e.g. Delap) can play in the CL (not entirely sure why but that's what people are saying, something to do with squad size maybe)

    I didn't know he left ahead of the CWC final but that just proves he for one realised it was BS, maybe he didn't want to share the stage with Orange Man

  7. #1237
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,881
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mac76 View Post
    I don't think you can assume Chelsea didn't push him out just because his wages are relatively 'low' - as I've said before my understanding is they need to offload some players in order that newer signings (e.g. Delap) can play in the CL (not entirely sure why but that's what people are saying, something to do with squad size maybe)

    I didn't know he left ahead of the CWC final but that just proves he for one realised it was BS, maybe he didn't want to share the stage with Orange Man
    Well Mac, if you remember at the time, even while we were speaking with him and the rumours were swirling, Maresca made it clear that the player was wanted and he was in no mood to entertain any distractions.

    Once we agreed the deal, again he stated publicly that it was the player that pushed for it. A bit similar to how we got Trossard, though Chelsea were in a far stronger position than Brighton to hold on to their player.

    Also there were quite a few rumours about him not getting on that well with Marseca, falling foul of the rules a few times and poor performances in training. I just hope he knows Arteta is going to be far stricter than anything he witnessed under Enzo.

    But you are right that Chelsea do need to sell some players to appease UEFA (they are fine with EPL FFP rules), but I doubt Madueke was identified as one of the players that needed to go initially.


    https://www.football.london/chelsea-...-noni-32012971

    https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/nob...054924269.html

  8. #1238
    MOe Marc Overmars's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    32,459
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Gyokeres announcement is expected over the weekend where he’ll join up with the squad in Singapore.

    So that just leaves possibly one more signing, Eze maybe? Would make what is currently an excellent window into a great one.

    You’d think we will see some exits soon too.

  9. #1239
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    11,238
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 21_GOONER_SALUTE View Post
    Well Mac, if you remember at the time, even while we were speaking with him and the rumours were swirling, Maresca made it clear that the player was wanted and he was in no mood to entertain any distractions.

    Once we agreed the deal, again he stated publicly that it was the player that pushed for it. A bit similar to how we got Trossard, though Chelsea were in a far stronger position than Brighton to hold on to their player.

    Also there were quite a few rumours about him not getting on that well with Marseca, falling foul of the rules a few times and poor performances in training. I just hope he knows Arteta is going to be far stricter than anything he witnessed under Enzo.

    But you are right that Chelsea do need to sell some players to appease UEFA (they are fine with EPL FFP rules), but I doubt Madueke was identified as one of the players that needed to go initially.


    https://www.football.london/chelsea-...-noni-32012971

    https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/nob...054924269.html
    Yep, Chelsea did have to make player sales (which is why I was mainly against the move, I don’t want to help them get out of a financial hole of their own making) but it was also why I said the deal was likely to have been a relatively easy one. They weren’t going to demand clauses and cash up front etc because they just want to make it appear like they are keeping in line with FFP.

  10. #1240
    Member Mac76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    London
    Posts
    16,787
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ...and the other thing that made it easy was Arsenal seemingly just agreeing to the fee Chelsea demanded without any haggling - yes the wages are 'low' but still they should bargain over any player as a matter of principle, after all there was no sign anyone else was in for him

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •