Santos is better than Gibbs in terms of attacking play. But then he's a left-winger really.
Gibbs is better in every other way.
Eboue was better than Sagna going forward too.
Santos is better than Gibbs in terms of attacking play. But then he's a left-winger really.
Gibbs is better in every other way.
Eboue was better than Sagna going forward too.
I hate Communists.
If you don’t send this signature to ten people, you will become a Spurs fan.
RvP will stick 'em in a camp. No worries,.Originally Posted by GB.
Für eure Sicherheit
This, he's not a defender at all. Just play TV 5 at LB tbh
"I really like Arsenal. Do you really like Arsenal, or only Arsenal with trophies?" - Dennis Bergkamp.
"Which Arsenal do they want back, the one Arsene created?" - Tony Adams.
Their's enough cunts at Barca as it is
"I really like Arsenal. Do you really like Arsenal, or only Arsenal with trophies?" - Dennis Bergkamp.
"Which Arsenal do they want back, the one Arsene created?" - Tony Adams.
After recovering from his difficult Mental Month™, Charlie is almost rivalling NQ at the one-liners now.
I know the month is not yet over.
I think defensively in terms of positioning and in one on ones Santos is better. I attribute the first half at Chelsea to getting used to the intensity of PL and getting used to our game as well. He was able to improve in the II half. Gibbs has more legs in him and willing to work more than Santos, who can look lazy at times. Not sure Santos has shown enough to be considered a winger. Hasn't shown his crossing ability, neither is he taking the opposing players with running, but has loads of trickery & skill, passing and ability to make late runs and is not afraid to shoot. I have a feeling with time he will gel in well.
He has been spending too much time around RVP.
Don't forget Wenger is German too.
It's better to burn out, than to fade away.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
