his first 3 months were good but he lacks consistancy, I say give him one more year
his first 3 months were good but he lacks consistancy, I say give him one more year
He might be a 'playa' though. Remember the silhouette in the Independent super injunction article a while back? Was obviously Chakma, that horrific hair-gelled atrocity could be spotted from a mile off.
Harsh... Chamakh was doing the business for us while RvP was out... I just don't think that since RvP returned that Cham was given any chance to prove himself... He will come good next season.Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn
you need to be a good player to come good, and a good player he certainly is not
Old GW:
Total Cumulative Posts 4,487 ( 0.23% of total forum posts )
Joined 23-August 06
Chamakh is the least of our problems. Expected him to get between 10-15 this season and thats what he got,
Job done id say. He'll be better next season.
The problem is that when he is given a chance, he never gives the manager a headache for the next game. Hernandez at United forced Berbatov out of the team due to several cameos. You don't get that with Chamakh or Bendtner, when they come on we resign ourselves to the likelihood we're not going to get the goal we need.
Wouldnt disagree with that. Chamakh is a better starter than as a sub coming on. I think he'll come good though. If Wenger had the balls to play Chamakh and RVP upfront, we'd be better off.
Hoping he gets a good pre season under his belt, scores a few v Austrian pub teams and then bangs them in at the start of the season and grows from there.
Considering it's his first season in the prem, and the chronic lack of suppy from the wings, he has had a good first season.
Yup.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote