89 was definitely more exciting.
Needing to beat QPR at home slightly less so although they tried their best.
89 was definitely more exciting.
Needing to beat QPR at home slightly less so although they tried their best.
tbh.
Yes thanks, cba with footy forums anymore it gets too depressing hearing all the gloomsters.Originally Posted by Letters
It was worth waiting for.
I'm fine thanks. Hope you're well
Considering how badly we started we played some pretty spectacular football in the second half of the season only to show a soft underbelly again. City arent that good a side, certainly compared with Arsenal and Manure sides of the past. I would say two world class signings a bit of luck on the injury front and we arent that far from silverware. Keep the faith.
89 it was won with Class and Style.
No diving around, no play acting, no hysteria or stupid commercial fuelled commentary, the two top teams head to head deciding it on goals scored in the last seconds of the season, superior in every way to city's billion quid raid that almost fell to pieces against ten man relegation candidates. Magical night versus monstrous moneyfest.
Für eure Sicherheit
89 was definitely better.
ArseblogAnd while the Invincibles have rightly been named the best team of the Premier League era, the whole concept of a ‘Premier League era’ is a load of old bollocks. It ignores the fact that football, and great football at that, existed long before Sky and the marketing men got their greedy hands on the game.
“We’ve never seen anything like this”, bleated the pundits after an admittedly exciting end to this season, but frankly anyone who thinks Man City struggling to beat off 10 man relegation fodder at home is more worthy than Arsenal having to beat the reigning Champions by two clear goals at their own ground – and doing so in the final seconds of injury time – is off their rocker.
http://arseblog.com/2012/05/squad-assessment-part-1/
It's better to burn out, than to fade away.
I think that City's tops Man Utd's comeback against Bayern Munich and Liverpool against AC Milan. The reason being, Man City HAD to score 2. Man Utd had to score 1, and therefore would have been able to force the game into extra time. As it happens, Bayern heads dropped, and they managed to score the winner in added time, too.
Liverpool against AC Milan was remarkable. However, they had an entire half to do it and that crucial 3rd goal of their comeback was a penalty.
However, Anfield 89 tops it all. I remember, embarrassingly, asking the question in the 'Final Day Fixtures' thread in the wake of Aguero's goal, but with the benefit of a cool head, I can now see that the circumstances around Michael Thomas' goal were so much more different. We HAD to win by 2 clear goals (something no other team had done at Anfield since 1983), we were given no chance (even one of the well-known tabloids published 'You've got no chance, Arsenal' on the front page on the morning of the game) and it was a stand-alone fixture having been delayed to the bank holiday weekend. Everything about that night was special.
Formerly TMOKJ
As for final day drama, I've been told that almost every league title deciding game(s) went down to the final day in the decade of the '70s (although final day fixtures used to be staggered somewhat)
I'll need clarification on this. Need some of our old stalwarts to confirm (Conewood, I'm looking in your direction!)
Formerly TMOKJ
94/95 was better tbh
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
