User Tag List

Page 21 of 21 FirstFirst ... 11192021
Results 201 to 208 of 208

Thread: Match Reaction Norwich

  1. #201
    Pat Rice LDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    17,723
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Grebbo View Post
    Chris Kamara, who comes across as an utter bell end, was getting very worked up on Goals on Sunday about our goals. He spent the entire Arse v Norwich segment going through videos of our goals saying how none of them were goals.

    Fair enough I thought and I waited for him to show Norwich's goal and how it was never a freekick in a million years.....

    Nothing.

    I know these people need to be sensationalist and hysterical to get viewers but I just don't know how anyone can be so biased. I think it was the same on MOTD as well.

    I don't care as it's funnier when we win with controversy, I like to think of Spuds fans having heart attacks over our luck, but I just think it's a bit odd.
    Why was our second dodgy?
    It's better to burn out, than to fade away.

  2. #202
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LDG View Post
    Why was our second dodgy?
    Reckoned Giroud pulled back the defender. Tbf if the penalty was a foul then so was this.

    Giroud had no need to pull back the defender either so people would have gone nuts at him if that was disallowed.

  3. #203
    Pat Rice LDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    17,723
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ahhh.

    Right, so their free-kick shouldn't have stood. Stays nil all.

    If the pelanty isn't given, then, our second goal stands. If the pelanty is given, our second is disallowed. Thus, we'd have been 1-0 up, if all was fair in love and war.

    I make that 3 points.

    Fuck 'em.
    It's better to burn out, than to fade away.

  4. #204
    bye Xhaka Can’t's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    15,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LDG View Post
    Why was our second dodgy?
    If it hadn't have been raining and the prevailing wind was from a slightly different direction, there probably would have been a lower level of humidity. This would have affected the trajectory of the ball played into the middle because of some atmospheric pressure stuff that is like well complicated. The ball would therefore have gone a bit to the right of Giroud, or maybe behind him or something like that and the defender would have closed him down before he had a chance to turn and the defender rather than putting it in his own goal, would have cleared it.

    Walcott would then have got the ball and run headlong into a defender with the ball richicheting to the left or maybe the right. At which point it would have rolled safely away.

    What those biased ****s don't tell you though, is that Gibbs would have run onto it, or maybe Arteta and played it back into the box where Podolski would have volleyed it into the back of the net only for him to be wrongly adjudged to be offside even though the linesman didn't have a good view of the incident making the right decision even though he was clearly wrong.

  5. #205
    Pat Rice LDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    17,723
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by GB. View Post
    If it hadn't have been raining and the prevailing wind was from a slightly different direction, there probably would have been a lower level of humidity. This would have affected the trajectory of the ball played into the middle because of some atmospheric pressure stuff that is like well complicated. The ball would therefore have gone a bit to the right of Giroud, or maybe behind him or something like that and the defender would have closed him down before he had a chance to turn and the defender rather than putting it in his own goal, would have cleared it.

    Walcott would then have got the ball and run headlong into a defender with the ball richicheting to the left or maybe the right. At which point it would have rolled safely away.

    What those biased ****s don't tell you though, is that Gibbs would have run onto it, or maybe Arteta and played it back into the box where Podolski would have volleyed it into the back of the net only for him to be wrongly adjudged to be offside even though the linesman didn't have a good view of the incident making the right decision even though he was clearly wrong.
    Bollocks!
    It's better to burn out, than to fade away.

  6. #206
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,218
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LDG View Post
    Ahhh.

    Right, so their free-kick shouldn't have stood. Stays nil all.

    If the pelanty isn't given, then, our second goal stands. If the pelanty is given, our second is disallowed. Thus, we'd have been 1-0 up, if all was fair in love and war.

    I make that 3 points.

    Fuck 'em.
    Exactly! It's an utter nonsense.

    Ah well, fuck em the dumb chebs.

  7. #207
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,891
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't remember Norwich complaining much last year when in the last minute one of their players took out judas two yards from the goal, from behind stopping judas putting it in an open goal for the win.

  8. #208
    Member Japan Shaking All Over's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Tokyo<Japan - Wandsworth>London
    Posts
    5,298
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Its all a well laid out conspiracy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •