Ahhh.
Right, so their free-kick shouldn't have stood. Stays nil all.
If the pelanty isn't given, then, our second goal stands. If the pelanty is given, our second is disallowed. Thus, we'd have been 1-0 up, if all was fair in love and war.
I make that 3 points.
Fuck 'em.
It's better to burn out, than to fade away.
If it hadn't have been raining and the prevailing wind was from a slightly different direction, there probably would have been a lower level of humidity. This would have affected the trajectory of the ball played into the middle because of some atmospheric pressure stuff that is like well complicated. The ball would therefore have gone a bit to the right of Giroud, or maybe behind him or something like that and the defender would have closed him down before he had a chance to turn and the defender rather than putting it in his own goal, would have cleared it.
Walcott would then have got the ball and run headlong into a defender with the ball richicheting to the left or maybe the right. At which point it would have rolled safely away.
What those biased ****s don't tell you though, is that Gibbs would have run onto it, or maybe Arteta and played it back into the box where Podolski would have volleyed it into the back of the net only for him to be wrongly adjudged to be offside even though the linesman didn't have a good view of the incident making the right decision even though he was clearly wrong.
I don't remember Norwich complaining much last year when in the last minute one of their players took out judas two yards from the goal, from behind stopping judas putting it in an open goal for the win.
Its all a well laid out conspiracy