henry was so shit for them for most of his first season that their brass said "whoever signed him deserves a slap."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/foot...pe/7353306.stm
henry was so shit for them for most of his first season that their brass said "whoever signed him deserves a slap."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/foot...pe/7353306.stm
I have heard that said as well. However, there have also been comments that his few chances in the first team are going to get even fewer with Fabregas there. He might not even get onto the subs bench for many games.
However, do Arsenal really want a player who will be agitating for a move back to the team of his DNA in 3 years or so?
While all answers are responses, not all responses are answers.
That's the thing. Disregarding for a minute that Henry was getting older and would therefore be more likely to be injured, a player can be great in one team or league and less effective in another. It would be funny if we sold Cesc for 35M and then he turned into a damp squib -especially if our buys with the money turned up trumps.
Apart from last summer when he told Fabregas he was staying and Barca to sod right off...
Every year we keep him our position gets weaker. If we kept him for another year and then ended up having to really sell him on the cheap or, worse, go on a free, everyone would be bleating about how we should have sold when we were in a strong position.
We should sell him this summer IMO, we've got enough in midfield without him and this is our last year in a strong enough position to get decent money.
And £35m is decent money for him IMO. If you disagree then fair enough, we'll agree to disagree.
TG, yeah if they get Fabregas then his time will be up, unless he's prepared to wait for Xavi to retire, even then he wouldn't be guaranteed a spot. My worry with getting Thiago would be that we would essentially have him on loan until he reached world class level then they would want him back, albeit for an inflated fee.
I think theres a difference between standing up to a player and doing what Wenger did last summer.
Standing up to Cesc would have meant telling him to STFU about Barca, tell him hes not being sold and get on with it here.
What Wenger did, tell Cesc to give it one more year and then we'll see
Cesc is still young. Has a few more years left on his contract. We can and should get more than £35m. Is he worth as much as Carroll? Like hell he is.
can see Arsenal not accepting 31mil unless they get a player worth at least a carrot thrown in!
however if a cash offer of 40mil comes along then I can see us biting........which may be the way we will be left to go, we can put up a fight but I don't think we have the weight the likes of Utd etc who could hold out on Ronaldo, we may just have to accept that to some we may be considered a feeder club the same way we look at the likes of Southhampton
40 mil along with money his departure frees up for salarywill pay for the names we have been most strongly with, Gervinho, Alvarez and now Cahill
we should have more left over for lets say Mata
couple that with the departure of some dead wood we could even add a few more
I dont think we can go into next season with a smaller squad than what we have already, which is what seems to be the case every new season (no figures to fall bck on, just seems like that......well the quality is definitely lower)