We do have a good manager although I feel his idealism (which may be similar to my ranting here) is getting in the way of a more pragmatic approach which, like it or not, is needed these days. It has to be said that Utd's resources are greater than ours but we could be doing more too. It'll be interesting to see how Utd do over the next few seasons. Brilliant as he is Fergie has only had one billionaire-fuelled team to contend with till recently. Now there's two it's going to be harder. There's no doubt that Fergie > Wenger. But seriously fella, Wenger > most managers. Not saying there aren't others around who could do better but there aren't loads IMO.
Wenger was greater than most managers till 06. After that something got switched off and he is nowhere near being close to a top manager. His failures (which I have mentioned countless times) are just baffling and are not the signs of a manager > most managers! You may disagree but I personally believe that in terms of tactics and leadership, he is probably one of the worst 3 or 4 in the PL.
Football has changed, not Wenger. And while I agree that he needed to keep up with the times more you don't keep a team top 4 in the era of billionaires by being as incompetent as you're making out. And it's NOT been a steady decline, the Invincibles fell apart in 2 seasons to the point we struggled to finish top 4, lasagnagate etc. Wenger then built a young side on the cheap which while too mentally week to finish the job was technically good enough to challenge for the title more than once. Again, not the actions of the bumbling idiot you seem to think.
Most of 2011 has been baffling and frustrating but I put most of that down to meeting MrsL (I first met her just after we beat Barca at home, check out the results since. QED)
I can feel myself getting dumber every time I read stuff from certain posters. Quite tedious. The one interesting thing I read was that Chelsea and, now, Man City will have bought success and it becomes uninteresting when it pretty much always boils down to which billionnaire owner has the deepest pockets. I agree with that. There is the issue of where you draw the line....some clubs will always have an inherent advantage. Man Utd have had a huge advantage because of their previous successes and have spent a fuckload of money in the last 10 years. That has helped them stay at the top. We would agree that they have earned that right and it's different from being handed it like what has happened to Chelsea and Man City. But at what point does it become 'enough' of a reward and, in particular, uncompetitive for football in general? It's a virtuous cycle and it's clear that not everyone has an equal chance. There are other advantages...we have a geographical advantage of being near central London. It's never going to be a level playing field.
Everyone will have their own line, but I'd guess that for 95% (including nearly all non top-league fans), a team being allowed to play real-life FM with the unlimited money cheat ala Man City is not even close to it. As Letters said - most of the problems of football today is because of the obscene money involved. There has to be more regulation. Salary caps, transfer caps. Other than money there are still other problems - there has to be retrospective punishment. Permitted use of video technology. A much more transparent rating system for referees - punishment for poor performing refs and better rewards for good refereeing performances. A lot of shit needs to be sorted out. I do believe that strikes are wrong at a time when negotiations are still going on. Vote Syn for UEFA Presidency.