I used to follow the NFL very closely in the 80s/ 90s and when I look at it today it is unrecognisable. There seems to be very little stability in terms of the rosters. Back when I watched you could almost guarantee the star players would all turn out for the one team through their careers, or the productive years in their careers. Sure, there would be movement but not like the merry-go-round I see today. That's one of the reasons I haven't gone back to it. Who they hell knows who anybody is. All the expansion teams, the rotating rosters. I do know that the draft was something that was routinely "subverted" through the trade system, so no actual guarantee the lowest finishers got the hottest new talent. But they'd get something at least, maybe a 2nd or 3rd round pick combination. And the system applies to rookies only. As for the wage cap, from what I can gather that's a device designed to ensure the players get wheelbarrows of cash and extra wheelbarrows of cash when the revenues rise. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's an overall cap. It's not like saying a single player can only earn x amount. It's to do with the entire wage bill for the team. And coaches and staff aren't included in that. And there's no limit ion what can be spent on facilities, particularly all important medical and fitness facilities, doctors, trainers, etc. This is the most lucrative league in all of sport, still much bigger than the PL. Everything about it revolves around money.
In fact the chavs, gypos and Utd are like the first NFL style PL teams. Cash, cash, cash. More cash and wheeler dealing all over the place. And the Spaniard and Italian clubs take on another aspect of American sport, the nasty associations with highly undesirable individuals who call themselves "businessmen". We're seeing those types here too, your Russians and Arabs. I don't think Kroenke is one of that gang. He's more a leech. Finding rich veins and depositing himself for the long haul.