My argument is based on results and what happens on the pitch. Yours is based on...? Not sure. The protracted contract dispute sort of let the cat out of the bag regarding the money thing. I don't know why you hero worship this very average kid and then put the boot into a solid pro like Arteta. Attention maybe.
Für eure Sicherheit
Anyway, Gervinho is a better player (which isn't saying much) so hopefully he keeps Walcott out vs Norwich and thereafter. At least Gervinho gets himself in the game, albeit in a haphazard manner. We can't afford Walcott's anonymous outings in this run in.
Für eure Sicherheit
Based n what happens on the pitch yet you disregard his goals and assists?Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn
Not a good attempt at WUMming and then to top it off by calling Gervinho a better player pretty much proves it.
Oh well, il continue supporting our best player and not pretend to be a gooner like yourself.
Anyway on to more important things than you being laughably wrong yet again
We can go 3rd with a win here. What a horrific league this is
I did the goals analysis. He's a +1 goal scorer like Vela. If he's our best player we're fucked. Fortunately he's not within a mile.Based n what happens on the pitch yet you disregard his goals and assists?
Not a good attempt at WUMming and then to top it off by calling Gervinho a better player pretty much proves it.
Oh well, il continue supporting our best player and not pretend to be a gooner like yourself.
Certainly it's a horrific league though. Us going third would be a crushing indictment of the other teams around us. Especially the billion quid chavs.
Für eure Sicherheit
Walcott? Best player?
Tbf, as shit as Gervinho has been, he's a much better footballer than Walcott. He's a natural dribbler of the ball, can get pass players with his trickery, has technical ability and has a few goals in him. He only needs to be able to maintain his composure when it's time to kick the ball into the net and he'll become at least a decent striker.
As for Walcott, I've already said what is to be said about him. Wenger got it wrong again as, he should have sold this non-footballer - when he tried to hold the club ransom for pay rise and tried to dictate where he should play - and gotten in a proper striker. But then, no club would touch Walcott (says how well he's rated, huh?) during the time he was causing trouble, so maybe a bit harsh on Wenger to say he got it totally wrong not selling him.
Last edited by Özil's Panoramic View; 10-04-2013 at 11:14 PM.
unfortunately NQ has let himself down very badly since his quotes to the media some time ago and I fear the campaign he has waged on GW against walcott and giroud is a bitter reaction to a drunken night back in october 2012, recorded forever in the history books.
http://www1.skysports.com/football/n...st-games-ever-."Walcott gave the club a lifeline," reflected Quinn. "Walcott was incredible in that second half; once Arsenal got a little bit of impetus, it was all through him and Giroud. They were the two who made the difference for me."
Last edited by Kano; 10-04-2013 at 11:42 PM.
Outed
Für eure Sicherheit
The two of them though. They show flashes of quality and then nothing for huge spells. The only reason they can get a game is because everyone else has been sold. Wasn't much chance of seeing Chamakh on the pitch when RvP was here. This is another downside of the selling policy, there's no incentive for players to get their shit together.
Für eure Sicherheit
An interesting new logic here.
Played coz others have been sold.
Using the same logic, Henry only played cos we sold Anelka. Or does NQ logic apply only to players who continuously humiliate you? Although you are right about Giroud
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote