Although...we've reduced India to 144 for 9 so I guess it's not all over after all.
Although...we've reduced India to 144 for 9 so I guess it's not all over after all.
Hmmm - depends whether England can eat the deficit without losing 2 wickets, methinks...Originally Posted by Letters
Putting the laughter back into manslaughter
Well. We're 50-4 so apparently not
Goes back to an old 'Drop the Dead Donkey' quote "There will be school children growing up thinking 'England batting collapse' is one word"
81 all out
India need 49 to win.
And get it without losing a wicket
Us
Test match done in 2 days.
Few days on the beach.
Us
England's batting shat the bed again.
3-1 defeat in the series.
Also this results counts towards the World Test Championship final so it will be India v New Zealand at Lord's in June.
Would've been England if the result were reversed.
Seems the experiment with squad rotation didn't work though at least the didn't consistently pick Xhaka
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
