What balls! Charlie Adam's was a hit and hope and frankly if anyone scores from that range it's a goal-keeping error.Charlie Adam's 65-yard effort against arguably the world's best goalkeeper was a once-in-a-lifetime strike. Wilshere's, while spectacular and technically difficult, was nothing of the sort.
Even Wilshere's was a hit and hope. Doubt he planned to hit a top corner, just tried to twat it as hard as he could. Wilshere's strike was better though. His goal from last year deserved to win but this year there have been a few better. Zamora's was more calculated. I thought Pelle's was the best. Not many special goals in general though, not a memorable year in terms of goals or matches.
Who's that quote from? What they don't get is the 'once-in-a-lifetime' bit of their own statement. Yes Charlie, do it again. Impossible because it was a pure fluke in the first place. So should a pure fluke be goal of the season? Not really. Austin's header for QPR last Sunday was a better goal than Adam's, not as spectacular, but technically excellent and intended. Wilshere's is a mile ahead but not on par with some of the excellent team goals we have scored this season. Out of the bunch of spectacular (which is the main and stupid criteria) goals Zamora's was the best because it was spectacular (ticks the idiot box) and it was technical and it was intended.
Für eure Sicherheit
That Pelle goal was good. In that one match there was another goal that could have been contender for goal of the season.
I didn't think Jack's goal was the best goal of the match let alone the entire season.
Just shows you the power of Arsenal fans.
Most digital and tech-savvy supporters by far tbh.
Don't give up the day jobs lads.
Ramsey's PR guy is blatantly forcing him to becoming less boring. Instead he needs to embrace it and become a Scholes, not a Beckham.