User Tag List

Page 7 of 51 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 502

Thread: Nuri Sahin

  1. #61
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    124
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Japan Shaking All Over View Post
    I agree. . .we do need an enforcer because by the sounds of it Sahin is a little more finesse than brawn

    A centre three of Sahin, Arteta and Corzorla is not going to stand up to Stoke or the like. . .Diaby now becomes our meathead and he is one tackle away from the physios table.

    Bring Sahin in but sury to god when Wenger days we need o,e midfielder he means one permanant signing and not a one year loanee, what happens if things dont work out we are going to be back at square one.

    Sahin for Jack MVila for Song, Songs money will pay for MVila so no need to worry. IMO opinion RvCs money goes in Llorente, why let him go to Juve for 18 mil, moreover euros, we can pay that. . .its about time we had quality with back up at every position
    Songs money has already been spent so the only option is for a loan deal.When will people realise on here that Arsene can only spend what he gets in from the transfers out of players.Bet there wasnt a problem with songs attitue,the club had to sell him to break even.Who else would of brought in 15 million??

  2. #62

  3. #63
    Selling optimism to fools KSE Comedy Club's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    5,169
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yep, he wanted more money, he's got it now

  4. #64
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,494
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Always knew it was about money on both sides(bad attitude, cancer, was just the usual bs), Song wanted a new contract, and lets be honest Arsenal with the business model, wanted money from his potential sale.

    Oh well, it's business, everyone got what they wanted

  5. #65
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,905
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hobson's choice View Post
    Always knew it was about money on both sides(bad attitude, cancer, was just the usual bs), Song wanted a new contract, and lets be honest Arsenal with the business model, wanted money from his potential sale.

    Oh well, it's business, everyone got what they wanted
    bollocks. his agent has come out and said that he wanted to reneogaiate his contract. arsenal said wait till september, he said no, used the transfer window to blackmail the club. greedy disloyal ****. tried to blackmail the club who rightly called his bluff and sold him

  6. #66
    New Signing
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    82
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Our priority after RVP should have been to HOLD on to our best players. After last summer that should have been goal number 1. RVP aside, the sale of Song is unbelievable, it is ridiculous that we are flogging him for for an average price. The offer was nothing special, he had a few years left and now reports are claiming he wanted a new contract. Lessons still havent been learnt, people can try and claim song was a villain etc but the harsh reality is that we need to SELL in order to buy. How anyone can expect to be title contenders is beyond belief, and please enough of this player hunt where if a player has a different opinion, he is 'poison' to the club.

  7. #67
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,731
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ollie the optimist View Post
    bollocks. his agent has come out and said that he wanted to reneogaiate his contract. arsenal said wait till september, he said no, used the transfer window to blackmail the club. greedy disloyal ****. tried to blackmail the club who rightly called his bluff and sold him
    Yes, he tried to renegotiate his contract, which isn't surprising given that he's on $50K a week which is the same as Bendtner, Diaby and Chamakh. I don't know why you mention blackmail, it's simply a worker using the transfer window to strengthen his bargaining position. I think it says more about the board's greed than Song that he was on so little in the first place.

  8. #68
    New Signing
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    82
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The board surely have to shoulder the blame? How can you defend them in this situation without assassinating Song's character? Somehow i dont think that is the case. Sahin is a great addition though, complimented with Mvilla type of player than i suppose we limited the damage as much as we could. But that is the point, losing Song weakens us extremely, its totally unnecessary of Wenger and co to do it and put us in this position.

  9. #69
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Lambeth, London
    Posts
    5,891
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SayNoMore View Post
    The board surely have to shoulder the blame? How can you defend them in this situation without assassinating Song's character? Somehow i dont think that is the case. Sahin is a great addition though, complimented with Mvilla type of player than i suppose we limited the damage as much as we could. But that is the point, losing Song weakens us extremely, its totally unnecessary of Wenger and co to do it and put us in this position.
    It's called transistion and it happens every single summer at Arsenal, if the likes of Theo & Vermaelen have stand out seasons this year they will be off next summer, let's not kid ourselves.

  10. #70
    New Signing
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    82
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Transition has been completed a long time ago, this is our 'self sustaining model'. What a load of shite.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •