
Originally Posted by
Niall_Quinn
I'm saying - IF the stories are true - Villa wanted to sell Watkins and Arteta wanted to buy him, despite knowing he'd lose Sesko. Obviously Arteta believed we were dangerously short up front and that couldn't be allowed to persist through the end of the season. That makes sense from a football point of view. It's not a guarantee of a title, it doesn't mean Watkins might not get injured in his first game for us, but for him to get the goals we'd need to overhaul Liverpool he has to to be playing here regardless of what else happens.
Non-football people decided the fee was too high, his age was wrong and the sell-on fee was a potential problem. So THEIR priorities are clearly paramount over and above football. It's about the finances with them, even when the requirements of the team are unequivocally clear. Is it unfair to say that? Business first then, which by definition is a lack of ambition in a sporting sense. This lot aren't going for what is possible, as you might get with a moderately wealthy owner trying to keep a lower league club in business, this lot have control of one of Europe's biggest clubs and they have clearly shown their hand in terms of priorities and intentions.
Did they spend 700mill? That's where I would like to see a real breakdown of Arsenal's finances rather than just spending figures. We sold a lot to finance that 700 mill too, and TV companies financed some of it and prize money from almost winning things. How much has been invested by the owners beyond their purchase of shares? I honestly don't know. If it's a lot, out of their own pockets, then okay, maybe it's harsh to say they have no interest. I suppose it takes something to part a billionaire with his money. But if it's little or nothing, and considering they've seen their wealth increase on paper at least, I'd ask what's it to them if we win or lose on the pitch provided we are winning on the balance sheet?
We are competing, money has been invested to stop us plunging down the table. But do you see any real evidence of a desire to go beyond this level? Surely the summer and this January are all the evidence anyone needs to see these owners have their focus elsewhere? Quick check on the P&L account, fly in for the big games, photoshoot and mural painted on stadium, hop the private jet back over the pond and leave the bums in the comfy offices to count the beans and ignore the manager. Certainly seems like this to me.
We aren't talking nice to haves, we're talking clear and present football requirement at a critical point of the season. I don't think there's any excusing this away. It's negligence, incompetence, you could even say it's a lack of duty. A serious clubs says, 60mill, for the finished article today, when we are desperately short, and still in the hunt for the PL and CL? Where do I sign? Do you want your arm back?
Our lot, well, we're worried about the sell-on fee. Come on now, am I being unreasonable or reaching conclusions by taking huge leaps?