Honest Frank the Muppet and other Chavs sh!t

[GP]

mikel hasnt been charged with lying has he? he was charged for a seperate incident i think, well thats what some jounos were saying.


also chelsea should apologise, its not hard to say, after investigations, it turns out we are wrong and apologise to mark for the distress we have caused him.

The decent, human thing to do would be to apologise. It appears to be beyond them.

[Ollie the Optimist]

The decent, human thing to do would be to apologise. It appears to be beyond them.

yeah, sorry we are talking about chelsea here. the decent human thing doesnt apply to them. they are ****s,

[gooners]

mikel hasnt been charged with lying has he? he was charged for a seperate incident i think, well thats what some jounos were saying.


also chelsea should apologise, its not hard to say, after investigations, it turns out we are wrong and apologise to mark for the distress we have caused him.

chelsea did not accuse clattenburg of anything; they merely reported a serious complaint - which they had no way of ascertaining its veracity -- made to them by their player(s) to the relevant governing body.

it turned out, there was no substance to it -- so the players who made the allegation should be sanctioned and made to apologise. Chelsea as a club/employer did what they were obligated to do

[Ollie the Optimist]

chelsea did not accuse clattenburg of anything; they merely reported a serious complaint - which they had no way of ascertaining its veracity -- made to them by their player(s) to the relevant governing body.

it turned out, there was no substance to it -- so the players who made the allegation should be sanctioned and made to apologise. Chelsea as a club/employer did what they were obligated to do

chelsea told the media about this complaint regarding mata and mikel an hour after the game, they then made the complaint to the FA three days later. explain to me how that is right?

[GP]

chelsea told the media about this complaint regarding mata and mikel an hour after the game, they then made the complaint to the FA three days later. explain to me how that is right?

Of course it isn't right. They shouldn't have spoken to the media at all. You make your complaint, then shut the fuck up and let them investigate it.

Clattenberg should sue Chelsea.

[Niall_Quinn]

this was a case of he said/she said -- akin to date rape; except here there is no clear way of determining who said what (not from chelsea's vantage point anyway).

the club did what it is obligated to do -- lob it to the ref's employers.


As to the public statement of the report, the players involved were already spouting in the media post-match what happened and so forth. So i reckon chelsea did the right thing by making it clear publically that they are taking their player's issue seriously (especially where racist malignment is the case) and that they have have done what is expected of them.

I did not see any trial and conviction in the media IMHO.

This wasn't a he said/ she said it was a "me no speaky english" and the club and players (though not the few intelligent ones) jumping the bandwagon. Okay then, if the chavs have a care of duty to protect hysterical and libellous scum bags at the expense of an obviously innocent guy they can now apply that same standard to throwing the book at the ****s, can't they? Otherwise care of duty just means see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.

[Niall_Quinn]

The decent, human thing to do would be to apologise. It appears to be beyond them.

The decent human thing for them to do would be to shut all the doors and windows and turn the gas on, then start striking matches. But the ****s can't even do that.

[gooners]

chelsea told the media about this complaint regarding mata and mikel an hour after the game, they then made the complaint to the FA three days later. explain to me how that is right?

So it took chelsea 3 days to formalize a complaint to send to the FA. And?

As I said in a previous post, I think amidst the hulabaloo (the players spouting off post match) Chelsea were right in formally announcing that they were taking such a complaint seriously especially considering that the stench of the terry saga was still lingering about.

[gooners]

This wasn't a he said/ she said it was a "me no speaky english" and the club and players (though not the few intelligent ones) jumping the bandwagon. Okay then, if the chavs have a care of duty to protect hysterical and libellous scum bags at the expense of an obviously innocent guy they can now apply that same standard to throwing the book at the ****s, can't they? Otherwise care of duty just means see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.

I believe I have made this pont already --- that the players who made such a serious allegation deserve to be sanctioned if it is deemed to be of malicious intent. This is specifically the onus of the FA. Following which CFC should take a sufficiently serious disciplinary action against the players who made the allegation.

[Ollie the Optimist]

So it took chelsea 3 days to formalize a complaint to send to the FA. And?

As I said in a previous post, I think amidst the hulabaloo (the players spouting off post match) Chelsea were right in formally announcing that they were taking such a complaint seriously especially considering that the stench of the terry saga was still lingering about.

no the players didnt spout of the to the meida post match, the manager did. he said it to the press. the press were the first to know, thus making it a trial by media for clattenburg.