Quote Originally Posted by Niall_Quinn View Post
And he based that on his complaint about the referee. We were out of this after the first leg and he's trying to make out we were somehow back in it until the referee intervened. It's disingenuous and a total misread of the situation.
I agree however I am referring specifically to the issue of the four goals we conceded after that point which he did take responsibility for.

Does it change the fact that we fucked the tie up completely in the first leg? No. Is his willingness to brush it aside shocking and pertains to a level of complacency and disconnect that is deeply concerning? Yes

But he did say that