I do like the phrase "combing it in".
Syn's GHEL degree.![]()
I know you're so ensconced in the ways of the WUM that you probably don't even know what your real, honest, genuine assessment of something is anymore, but surely you must realise that limited players like Parker won't get England anywhere. Yes, he can do a job when some scrapping and 'honesty' is needed on the pitch, but to even think of challenging Spain, Holland, Germany and Brazil, you need players with composure, the ability to spot basic passing opportunities and the ability to actually make an effective attacking contribution. Thirty-yard hit and hope screamers don't count. And Gerrard is not a central midfield player. He is beyond a liability there. He only performs well when he has a free role behind a good striker to rampage about the pitch. That's why even a fifty five year-old Scholes is a better option than the indisciplined cloggers or pseudo-strikers masquerading as midfielders that will continue to clutter up the England set-up.
Ah the WUM thing
I forgot anyone who doesnt agree with you is a WUM
Boring and dull
Kyle Walker out of the England squad
Well, no. But always using this as a rebuttal when someone challenges your views is.
Anyway, take that grossly offensive bit when I call you a WUM out and respond to the rest of it.
Was what I said wrong? Or is it only fun to say the opposite of what evidence shows rather than actually be reasonable for a change and discuss something sensibly?
Last edited by Master Splinter; 27-02-2012 at 10:01 PM.