User Tag List

Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 110

Thread: USAMNOV'S MONEY

  1. #51
    Pat Rice LDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    17,723
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsMe View Post
    You'd rather be run by a bunch of people who couldn't give a sh*t about anything but money and laugh off the fans concerns whilst not hesitating to blame fans at the 1st opportunity?

    These were PHW's comments when Dein bought shares in Arsenal in the 80's:



    Calling investment into AFC as dead money, nice guy indeed.
    Do you really think that oil rich billionnaires, and Arabs really give two fucks about the clubs they toy around with? Really??

    Who do you think cares more about their clubs?

    Mr Hillwood, who's family have been running Arsenal for decades?

    Or some billionnaire who doesn't give a fuck about football.

    They're all ****s. Distuigishing between any of them is a load of rubbish.
    Last edited by LDG; 30-04-2012 at 09:26 AM.
    It's better to burn out, than to fade away.

  2. #52
    Cat give me a paw!! Flavs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    3,828
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LDG View Post
    Prince Al Shabib Halmanzazi, who has 50 brides.
    That's totally inappropriate

  3. #53
    Pat Rice LDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    17,723
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Flavs View Post
    That's totally inappropriate
    Much like your face....though I have changed it. Apologies for any offence.
    It's better to burn out, than to fade away.

  4. #54
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,731
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't see why "throwing money around" is used in a derogatory sense. It's as if the aim of football is to do the best you can by not spending money. Well wrong, if we can get an individual who is willing to invest in the club and isn't dodgy (like Sinawatra at City for example) we should at least consider it rather than dismissing it out of hand.

    And I still don't see the big issue with City's owners. Their actions so far have been sensible. They gave Hughes time to succeed, realised he wasn't good enough and got Mancini in. They seem to stay out of the football side of things, and from what I know haven't yet decided to fleece the fans with price rises. I know they are Arab and that immediately brings the stereotype of the "more money than sense" oil sheikh, but if we judge them by their actions, you can't really complain. I'd much rather them own the club than the Old Etonians who clearly hold the little people (i.e. the fans) in contempt.

  5. #55
    Pat Rice LDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    17,723
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Joker View Post
    I don't see why "throwing money around" is used in a derogatory sense. It's as if the aim of football is to do the best you can by not spending money. Well wrong, if we can get an individual who is willing to invest in the club and isn't dodgy (like Sinawatra at City for example) we should at least consider it rather than dismissing it out of hand.

    And I still don't see the big issue with City's owners. Their actions so far have been sensible. They gave Hughes time to succeed, realised he wasn't good enough and got Mancini in. They seem to stay out of the football side of things, and from what I know haven't yet decided to fleece the fans with price rises. I know they are Arab and that immediately brings the stereotype of the "more money than sense" oil sheikh, but if we judge them by their actions, you can't really complain. I'd much rather them own the club than the Old Etonians who clearly hold the little people (i.e. the fans) in contempt.

    Have you ever thought where these billionnaires get all their money? You can be sure as shit it is through dumping on the little guy in a far worse way than the Arsenal Board charging us £5.00 for a coke.

    They're not angels, and it pisses me off the way we don't push the boat out a bit more than we have been....but to make these rich owners out to be better than the "old etonians" is as short-sighted as it comes.
    It's better to burn out, than to fade away.

  6. #56
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    543
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Joker View Post
    I don't see why "throwing money around" is used in a derogatory sense. It's as if the aim of football is to do the best you can by not spending money. Well wrong, if we can get an individual who is willing to invest in the club and isn't dodgy (like Sinawatra at City for example) we should at least consider it rather than dismissing it out of hand.

    And I still don't see the big issue with City's owners. Their actions so far have been sensible. They gave Hughes time to succeed, realised he wasn't good enough and got Mancini in. They seem to stay out of the football side of things, and from what I know haven't yet decided to fleece the fans with price rises. I know they are Arab and that immediately brings the stereotype of the "more money than sense" oil sheikh, but if we judge them by their actions, you can't really complain. I'd much rather them own the club than the Old Etonians who clearly hold the little people (i.e. the fans) in contempt.
    Their actions have not been sensible. They have spent hundreds of millions (or are we into billions yet?) for slow gains, not even domination. That's not sensible, that's utterly ridiculous save for the fact they have even more utterly ridiculous bank reserves. It's not good football club custodianship no matter how greedily you may want to drool over trophies.

  7. #57
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,548
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LDG View Post
    Do you really think that oil rich billionnaires, and Arabs really give two fucks about the clubs they toy around with? Really??

    Who do you think cares more about their clubs?

    Mr Hillwood, who's family have been running Arsenal for decades?

    Or some billionnaire who doesn't give a fuck about football.

    They're all ****s. Distuigishing between any of them is a load of rubbish.
    Abrahmovic seems to care about it to some degree, he wants to win and has pumped his own money into it and seems to get pleasure from watching them succeed, if you like football and you own a football club then yes you will care.

    Hillwood doesn't give a toss, if he did he wouldn't treat the fans with such contempt, his comments when Dein bought it sum him up really, he's only interested in the value of his sharers or else he wouldn't be telling us 4th is a great achievement and settling for that etc etc

    I think both aren't great unless they're fans, however the current board are just moneymen who don't give a damn about football or the fans and that bugs me a lot.

  8. #58
    Member Kano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    10,319
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsMe View Post
    You'd rather be run by a bunch of people who couldn't give a sh*t about anything but money and laugh off the fans concerns whilst not hesitating to blame fans at the 1st opportunity?

    These were PHW's comments when Dein bought shares in Arsenal in the 80's:



    Calling investment into AFC as dead money, nice guy indeed.
    thankfully the bbc give this more context than your selective quote

    "Football was struggling with a poor image, a seemingly unshakable hooligan element and inadequate stadia.

    Then-chairman Peter Hill-Wood said at the time: "Some rich men like to buy fast cars, yachts or racehorses.

    "But David is more interested in Arsenal. I'm delighted he is - but I still think he's crazy. To all intents and purposes, it's dead money.' "

  9. #59
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    16,548
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry Tuffnutz View Post
    thankfully the bbc give this more context than your selective quote

    "Football was struggling with a poor image, a seemingly unshakable hooligan element and inadequate stadia.

    Then-chairman Peter Hill-Wood said at the time: "Some rich men like to buy fast cars, yachts or racehorses.

    "But David is more interested in Arsenal. I'm delighted he is - but I still think he's crazy. To all intents and purposes, it's dead money.' "
    Makes me laugh really, if PHW cared about Arsenal he certainly wouldn't treat it's bread and butter (the fans) in the insulting way he does. He's a fat cat with a cigar in his mouth who doesn't have a clue about the realities of modern day football.

    Say what you like about him but David Dein cared about the club, PHW made sure he along with a few others were tossed out on their ear because they wouldn't toe the line, that's why we are where we are.

    You can see when someone really cares about a club and PHW in my opinion doesn't, it's a business to him.

  10. #60
    Administrator Letters's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    40,716
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsMe View Post
    Get rid of PHW and co and bring him in, we might have some money to spend on some decent players at long last then. The current bunch are dinosaurs without a clue on how to run a successful club on the pitch, all they care about is money.
    Yeah, that's why we're going down

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •